| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 138492 | 2014-12-08 00:04:00 | SSD Brands | DeSade (984) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1389711 | 2014-12-08 04:07:00 | The standard reply to this sort of request is "You can have two out of three". My opinion is, you won't be able to notice any real difference in speed on the better quality SSD's. | PPp (9511) | ||
| 1389712 | 2014-12-09 20:52:00 | OCZ had reliability issues with their Agility 3 series. That's long fixed. Any and all will outlast normal PC life, tenfold... They still have had the highest RMA rate of any major SSD manufacturer over the past 3 years or so... the Agility3 had major issues (as did the Agilit and Agility 2), but their earlier Octane, and the whole Vertex line and more recent Vector models also have (lesser) issues. However, since they became a Toshiba subsidiary at the start of this year, there seems to have been a marked upswing in quality. |
inphinity (7274) | ||
| 1389713 | 2014-12-09 23:14:00 | www.computerlounge.co.nz The best balance of price/performance/reliability currently in my opinion. I bought two of them on special about $20 less than that a little while ago. I benchmarked them and they outperform my older samsung 830 series 256GB in all tests, think they are fairly comparable to an 840EVO in performance and that would be my other recommendation. www.computerlounge.co.nz |
dugimodo (138) | ||
| 1389714 | 2014-12-12 06:19:00 | I went for the Crucial MX100 256GB | DeSade (984) | ||
| 1389715 | 2014-12-12 21:05:00 | I just picked up a handful of those for a friend to pop in some laptops. Not bad for the cheapest SSD out there! Still plenty fast :-) | Chilling_Silence (9) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||