| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 62807 | 2005-10-20 03:34:00 | Zone Alarm and Norton AV | garyasta (1151) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 397827 | 2005-10-20 07:23:00 | meh it has served me well..... I am not saying it hasn't. Although I promise you would like Sygate a lot more (mind due the comany was just brought out my Nortons...... shudder). It is far less annoying and just as easy to use, and port forwarding :) But I am saying ZA it is not fit for gerneral use without that basic and obvious feature. |
Battleneter (60) | ||
| 397828 | 2005-10-20 17:57:00 | In the latest PC User mag this month, Zonealarm is rated much higher than the equivilent Nortons, and I think was one of the best firewalls to get. | netchicken (4843) | ||
| 397829 | 2005-10-20 18:38:00 | lol yes, it makes you wonder who writes these reviews sometimes. I will just say they are wrong for not putting ZA near the bottom rather than calling the person that wrote the artical completely incompetant or anything. A Firewall that can't port forward is not a real firewall. You have to "hope" your applications arn't effected by it, and if they are there's no way to fix it. I suggested Sygate not Nortons BTW, it just so happens Norton's purchased Sygate this month, I hope they don't wreck the product. And as for Norton's firewall I don't believe I can comment on that without swearing. |
Battleneter (60) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||