Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 64955 2006-01-02 23:40:00 Norton Ghost Nomad (952) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
417551 2006-01-02 23:40:00 Hi I have the old version. Just wondering about the modern versions. Do they, work inside windows or still in DOS? Do they work with external HDD?

Thanks.
Nomad (952)
417552 2006-01-02 23:44:00 Do they, work inside windows or still in DOS?

both, depending on your options


Do they work with external HDD?

if you mean will it backup to an external usb or firewire drive
yes
bartsdadhomer (80)
417553 2006-01-03 00:21:00 Let's say you wanna ghost C drive to D drive. Where C is the main drive for windows. Are you able to do this in windows xp?

If it isn't able to. Then you go to DOS, are you able to ghost to external usb or firewire HD in DOS as the destination?
Nomad (952)
417554 2006-01-03 04:05:00 with version 10, yes bartsdadhomer (80)
417555 2006-01-03 05:10:00 Is there a better imaging program than norton ghost? or is norton ghost top of the line? Prescott (11)
417556 2006-01-03 05:38:00 Well there WAS DriveImage by Powerquest which Symantec purchased.
And there is a company that makes a few hdd utilities and one of them was Drive imaging. But I cannot remember the darn diddly arn name of it.

Edit: Aha! Paragon Drive Backup (tucows.com)
bob_doe_nz (92)
417557 2006-01-03 05:48:00 Is there a better imaging program than norton ghost? or is norton ghost top of the line?
i've used ghost for years and it's always performed ok for me

some users seem to have problems, i've found it's one of those apps you really need to read the manual and the read me file for known issues and workarounds

i think i prefer ver 9 over 10 although 10 has better support for usb/firewire drives, it never worked too well in earlier versions

i've used acronis products and had mixed results

drive image was good but i haven't used it in a while
bartsdadhomer (80)
417558 2006-01-03 05:50:00 Is there a better imaging program than norton ghost? or is norton ghost top of the line?
Acronis True image.
STi (8857)
417559 2006-01-03 05:56:00 Great to hear. Ghost is now more user friendly :D
I use version 6.0, never failed for me and its v fast. During the win95/98 days a 30mins or 15min restore is all it needs, great when a darn little thing you just installed creates havoc and you can't find the solution, by the time you do find the solution, a reghost does it quicker.

Version 6 limits the files size to 2GB but I can create temporary small partitions to span the files out ... haha. Version 6.0 works with NTFS with no issues as long as not Ghosting disks but just partitions. Network deployment, er.. let's don't talk about that, that's way over my head. :)

I do a service pack when the main few softwares are up and running. But I do redownload the windows updates..... A bit too much hassle re ghosting I think. And the need to move off your personal files off the main drive so the ghost file won't be so huge.
Nomad (952)
417560 2006-01-03 06:08:00 EDit: True Image already mentioned

I use ghost however, have even backed up my linux test machine, will wipe the install and see if the ghost worked :)
If so, sweeeet

ext2 and 3 filesystems btw
Myth (110)
1 2