Forum Home
PC World Chat
Thread ID: 138049	2014-09-28 20:41:00	NZ's Top Pay Packet	bk T (215)	PC World Chat

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
1384946	2014-10-02 01:17:00	I don't have to think again, it's absolutely of no use. What are you going to do with it? At that stage, money is of no physical/practical value other than the number of zeros. Don't forget if you are earning 500K a year or more then you are probably working between 60-80 hrs a week and have a lot of responsibility to go with it.	Webdevguy (17166)
1384947	2014-10-02 02:10:00	This makes a $500,000 salary (www.nzherald.co.nz) look like pocket change	Webdevguy (17166)
1384948	2014-10-02 02:24:00	Don't forget if you are earning 500K a year or more then you are probably working between 60-80 hrs a week and have a lot of responsibility to go with it. Responsibilities, maybe, but very unlikely that they will work more/long hours than an ordinary minimum wage earner in terms of average per month. They usually work much lesser hours, and maybe, on special occasions, have to work longer hours - probably once, twice, or a couple of times a year. And they get much longer annual leaves and lots and lots extra privileges/benefits. From my past experience, the higher you climb up the pyramid the more responsibility, but lesser (actual) working hours ('cause, you have all the workers under you to get the physical jobs done), and of course, the higher remuneration.	bk T (215)
1384949	2014-10-02 03:19:00	The ones I know that earn the bigger bucks definitely put in more than a 40 week and have plenty of organizational responsibilities	Webdevguy (17166)
1384950	2014-10-02 03:20:00	Responsibilities, maybe, but very unlikely that they will work more/long hours than an ordinary minimum wage earner in terms of average per month. They usually work much lesser hours, and maybe, on special occasions, have to work longer hours - probably once, twice, or a couple of times a year. And they get much longer annual leaves and lots and lots extra privileges/benefits. From my past experience, the higher you climb up the pyramid the more responsibility, but lesser (actual) working hours ('cause, you have all the workers under you to get the physical jobs done), and of course, the higher remuneration. It sounds like your view has been tainted by bad experiences in the past.	Webdevguy (17166)
1384951	2014-10-02 03:23:00	Say whatever you like ..................	bk T (215)
1384952	2014-10-02 03:44:00	Don't forget if you are earning 500K a year or more then you are probably working between 60-80 hrs a week and have a lot of responsibility to go with it. You think? There are plenty of people on minimum wage working those kind of hours too.	pctek (84)
1384953	2014-10-02 03:49:00	Anyone unable to accomplish their tasks in 40 hours should wake up to the fact someone is making a dork of them. The more senior they are, the more likely it is to be self inflicted. There will be someone more competent who can manage the job properly (probably for a lesser cost).	R2x1 (4628)
1384954	2014-10-02 19:01:00	"With a total pay package worth $4.1 million, ANZ New Zealand's David Hisco is the top-paid boss in the Business Herald's executive pay survey." I see ANZ now want to pay for his pay rise by moving jobs off shore to India. www.stuff.co.nz And to casualize bank workers.. www.nzherald.co.nz	paulw (1826)
1384955	2014-10-02 20:50:00	Anyone unable to accomplish their tasks in 40 hours should wake up to the fact someone is making a dork of them. The more senior they are, the more likely it is to be self inflicted. There will be someone more competent who can manage the job properly (probably for a lesser cost). My fiancee earns just over $100K a year and often works more than a 40 hour week in order to get through work load. She is responsible for the work of 8 other teams which are made up of about 70 people in total. Those teams are part of a much larger organisation. She is worth every cent they pay her.	Webdevguy (17166)
1 2 3 4 5 6