| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 137966 | 2014-09-17 02:56:00 | Glenn Greenwald is a fraud | Zippity (58) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1384078 | 2014-09-17 08:55:00 | I cannot understand why anyone would prefer to believe a convicted criminal and his paid supporters rather than our elected politicians and officials. I do however accept that it is your right to do so. I have a bridge for sale if anyone is interested. Don't tell John or Bill about your bridge...They will sell it out from under you! |
ruup (1827) | ||
| 1384079 | 2014-09-17 10:52:00 | All I'll say is who would believe the BS whaleoil puts out, most of it is only his opinion. One point he makes REALLY, ??? I have plenty of different email accounts with various places, and NONE of them have it laid out the way he claims. It may be on a different program that he uses, but to claim that's what a REAL email looks like is utter BS. Obviously, AGAIN only his point of view for the program he uses, not for everyone. I suspect he is referring to the fact that the email he has includes information like IP addresses to confirm who is replying, as opposed to dotcom's megafail email that could have been written in a word document. |
Krakka (17266) | ||
| 1384080 | 2014-09-17 12:04:00 | I trust him slightly more then John Key ;) Me too. |
bk T (215) | ||
| 1384081 | 2014-09-17 21:46:00 | I trust him slightly more then John Key ;) Interesting. They're both politicians, so as far as the job goes neither can be trusted. But outside of politics, one is a criminal convicted of computer fraud, data espionage, and insider trading. The other isn't. Why would you trust the convicted fraudster, especially given his current desire to escape a legal process? |
Nick G (16709) | ||
| 1384082 | 2014-09-17 21:49:00 | I don't trust Oily Whale as far as I could throw him. +1 Hardly someone who's word I would take as fact. Having said that, if he backs up claims with legitimately gathered evidence, logic, etc, a personal dislike is no reason to ignore the man. |
Nick G (16709) | ||
| 1384083 | 2014-09-17 21:55:00 | Interesting. They're both politicians, so as far as the job goes neither can be trusted. But outside of politics, one is a criminal convicted of computer fraud, data espionage, and insider trading. The other isn't. Why would you trust the convicted fraudster, especially given his current desire to escape a legal process? I never said I held a high opinion of either of them :p One is a convicted criminal, the other is a proven liar. |
pcuser42 (130) | ||
| 1384084 | 2014-09-17 22:14:00 | I cannot understand why anyone would prefer to believe a convicted criminal .... That old chestnut again. Just how many years ago was that, 20 years. And his convictions were so long ago the are wiped by Germany's clean slate legislation |
1101 (13337) | ||
| 1384085 | 2014-09-17 22:19:00 | ... the other is a proven liar. Well said! I hate liars. |
bk T (215) | ||
| 1384086 | 2014-09-17 22:27:00 | It really is a myth to call this Labour party left wing if you consider it is the inheritor of the enactments of Roger Douglas, Richard Prebble, et al. Later Labour government didn't undo one iota of the Douglas "reforms", or those of the succeeding National Governments. You should have lived under the Harold Wilson UK Labour Government to understand what "left wing " means. ;) The fact is the top 1% are immune from our views, one way or the other. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1384087 | 2014-09-17 22:48:00 | I trust him slightly more then John Key ;) Then John Key what? I'm confused. The whole lot of them will say what they think people want to hear, or what they think will save their own skin. |
inphinity (7274) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 | |||||