| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 139469 | 2015-05-07 08:55:00 | Not good news for Samsung SSD 840 and SSD 840 EVO drives | Lawrence (2987) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1400237 | 2015-05-07 08:55:00 | These are popular and were known as very good SSD's but how things change www.techspot.com Wonder how many of the other SSD's will have problems crop up but it looks like just the TLC NAND of Samsung's |
Lawrence (2987) | ||
| 1400238 | 2015-05-07 18:36:00 | It's fine here. Havent had any probs with it yet | Speedy Gonzales (78) | ||
| 1400239 | 2015-05-07 21:57:00 | I'm running two of them in a system here without any issues. | Driftwood (5551) | ||
| 1400240 | 2015-05-07 21:59:00 | It's so-far-so-good, here! | bk T (215) | ||
| 1400241 | 2015-05-07 22:41:00 | Thanks for the headsup on this. My 16 mth old SSD 240 EVO definitely has the problem. Now to upgrade the firmware! |
linw (53) | ||
| 1400242 | 2015-05-07 23:27:00 | Duplicate! | linw (53) | ||
| 1400243 | 2015-05-07 23:39:00 | Seems I lucked out by being a cheapskate. My C: drive is a Samsung 830 Evo but when I bought more SSD's for other systems I went with Crucial because they were cheaper than the 840 series that was popular at the time. | dugimodo (138) | ||
| 1400244 | 2015-05-08 00:23:00 | Seems I lucked out by being a cheapskate. My C: drive is a Samsung 830 Evo but when I bought more SSD's for other systems I went with Crucial because they were cheaper than the 840 series that was popular at the time. Well done! |
linw (53) | ||
| 1400245 | 2015-05-08 00:27:00 | Much better performance after the update. Haven't got the large discrepancies in access time I had pre fix. A test before gave avge access of 163MB/s and after, 459 MB/s. |
linw (53) | ||
| 1400246 | 2015-05-08 23:23:00 | Installed the latest firmware some time back... no issues here, averaging 515MB/s. Drive is nearly 2 years old... it's a Vanilla 840. |
chiefnz (545) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||