Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 68448 2006-04-28 09:10:00 Polderbits v Audacity Misty (368) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
450276 2006-04-28 09:10:00 Hi
This may not be a fair contest as Polderbits costs money and Audacity is free. Nevertheless it would be interesting to have a small measure of comparability - just out of interest.
The latest version 5 Build 92 of Polderbits has recently been released and they say that the improvements are:


WHAT IS NEW IN VERSION 5?

We've made over 30 improvements to the software. Here is the top 10:

1 - New automatic track splitter options in the Editor (when you click on the "scissors" button):
* You can now determine the length of silence in between tracks to search for and the (background-)analysis of the recording now only starts when the track splitter windows is first opened.
* The option to split tracks in the middle of detected silences, or split tracks on the start and end of sound plus an optional fade-in and out.
* Split a recording in equally sized tracks.
* Split a recording in a given amount of tracks.

2 - The Editor window can now be enlarged by dragging at either of the 4 window edges and the edit-point controls are now slightly larger than before. This makes it easier to view and edit your tracks.

3 - The Recorder now displays the percentage of the recording volume setting and warns about saturation when the volume is too high.

4 - The Recording Timer window now has the option to automatically save a timed recording and then exit the Recorder.

5 - Separate left and right channel Wave view in the Editor (through the right-click menu of the Wave view).

6 - To make sure you can see the name of your tracks on your MP3 player, an "ID3V1 MP3-tag" is now included in MP3 files when saving multiple tracks, using the given Track and Album name.

7 - When defining a new Cut-Start point in the Editor, the Cut-End point is now always set a bit ahead initially so it is easier to edit.

8 - A new recording that is not yet edited, but directly saved as an uncompressed WAV sound file, is now saved almost instantly when being saved in a folder that resides on the same disk the temporary recording is stored in. This can speed up things quite a bit.

9 - The possibility to Select/Deselect All, or to invert the selection of tracks in the Save Tracks window of the Editor. This helps you to save exactly those tracks you need.

10 - The Editor now remembers the last save-as-type and sound quality for existing recordings you opened for editing.


How does that compare please ? I am certainly not trying to denigrate Audacity in any way as it is obviously an excellent program. Just wondering the advantages/disadvantages of a paid program doing somewhat similar things ??
Misty :)
Misty (368)
1