Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 71457 2006-08-06 11:16:00 Adsl modem firewall, v zone alarm firewall supergran (108) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
476515 2006-08-06 11:16:00 No I don't want flaming for still using za, what I want to know is which firewall do I use? I have bought an ethernet adsl router dick smith brand, that in its paper work says it has a firewall.

Now tomorrow, I am connecting mine and my daughters puters to broadband, using said router, and am wondering if I need zone alarm firewall as well as the factory one in the router.

TIA
supergran (108)
476516 2006-08-06 11:36:00 yes you still need ZA as the other firewall cannot stop anything accessing the net from your pc. tweak'e (69)
476517 2006-08-06 11:39:00 ZA will stop outward bound attempts which the router won't so yes you still should use it mikebartnz (21)
476518 2006-08-06 11:40:00 Don't know why using ZA should invite flaming. Just keep ZA going as it does different things such as warning you about malware trying to dial home. The router firewall will have the ability to detect technical sounding attacks which are not that likely against lowly accounts such as ours. I'd treat any router added protection as a bonus. linw (53)
476519 2006-08-06 11:43:00 Thanks everyone, this broadband thingy is new to me, and just hoping to try and do it right. I would hate for my puter, or my daughters brand new puter, to be open to attack. :o

As for za flaming, I have noticed a lot of posts lately against it, but not quite as many as against Nortons. LOL
supergran (108)
476520 2006-08-06 12:08:00 there are always those "its popular therfore its bad" posters. they are better firewalls but the price is right and its easy enough to use. tweak'e (69)
476521 2006-08-06 21:29:00 I'd agree with tweek'e. I've had ZA for years and no problems, it just works and never been hacked/attacked. I also very much like having the little meter icon on the task bar... you can quickly see if anything's coming in and going out (OK not much 'real world' use, but at least you can actually see something happening!). Shortcircuit (1666)
476522 2006-08-06 23:12:00 As for za flaming, I have noticed a lot of posts lately against it, but not quite as many as against Nortons. LOL
There are only a small handful of people here, if that, who aren't keen on ZoneAlarm, unlike Nortons who just about everyone dislikes. :p

If ZA works for you and you have no problems with it then there is no need to change.
FoxyMX (5)
476523 2006-08-07 00:00:00 There are only a small handful of people here, if that, who aren't keen on ZoneAlarm, unlike Nortons who just about everyone dislikes. :p

If ZA works for you and you have no problems with it then there is no need to change.


I would say there are a small number of people here that "like" ZA, and they are usually easy to spot as they have never tried anything else (if they had they wouldn't be using ZA lol).

ZA is fine for mum and dad users, but if you need a more configurable firewall that port forwards properly for many file sharing programs etc, I suggest avoiding it at all costs.
Master_Frost (9951)
476524 2006-08-07 00:30:00 I would say there are a small number of people here that "like" ZA, and they are usually easy to spot as they have never tried anything else (if they had they wouldn't be using ZA lol).

"Why change something when something you use works fine for you" ;)
stu161204 (123)
1 2