| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 139115 | 2015-03-12 22:58:00 | Yeah....Nah! | ruup (1827) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1396267 | 2015-03-13 07:38:00 | ruup and Richard - I am surprise by you both. I thought you were above this sort of name calling. | Jen (38) | ||
| 1396268 | 2015-03-13 07:55:00 | It seems you have some trouble with reading comprehension too. Life must be a miserable existence for you, so you try to read into things words that were never said. Find something that you enjoy, it may lift your spirits a bit. Excellent comment from a well respected pressf1 member |
prefect (6291) | ||
| 1396269 | 2015-03-13 08:20:00 | Well, who would have believed it, what I said 4 days ago is coming to pass... "I am surprised he hasn't actually said that the sudden largesse they are promising to spend in Northland will be dependent on the National candidate being elected. If Winston does get in then don't be surprised if there is then a sudden fiscal problem and Northland road spending gets deferred and deferred............." pressf1.pcworld.co.nz What a stinking corrupt man he is. |
Terry Porritt (14) | ||
| 1396270 | 2015-03-13 08:23:00 | Excellent comment from a well respected pressf1 member ...right after a moderator warning? :illogical |
pcuser42 (130) | ||
| 1396271 | 2015-03-13 08:24:00 | It's Friday. The plonk is kicking in. ;) | R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 1396272 | 2015-03-13 08:35:00 | Key seems to be throwing in a red herring when he says "If National lost the seat it had held for more than half a century, there could be consequences, such as throwing into doubt the South Korean free trade agreement (FTA) he is due to sign in Seoul this month, because it would require a vote in Parliament." www.stuff.co.nz If he is absent from Parliament by being in Korea then surely he would have a proxy vote according to the rules "Pairs – arrangements between the party whips concerning absent MPs. An absence by an MP in one party is cancelled out by the paired MP in the other party not voting on an issue. This means that the result of a division is not affected by the absence of an MP from one party. Pairing ceased in 1996 with the introduction of proxy voting for absent MPs." www.nzhistory.net.nz It would seem he really is desperately scaremongering. |
Terry Porritt (14) | ||
| 1396273 | 2015-03-13 10:36:00 | ...right after a moderator warning? :illogical No one is perfect. |
prefect (6291) | ||
| 1396274 | 2015-03-13 10:45:00 | Simpler than that Terry. National and United have a one vote majority, The Maori Party only have to support them on Confidence and Supply, although Maori also support bills which they believe are in their people's interests. If NZ First win the Northern electorate then we are back to even - a Mexican standoff in Parliament - no winners except on Supply etc. However there is an odd twist to MMP - the party proportions are decided by general elections, not by-elections. It is an esoteric subject which I only stumbled across while posting. So its not at all clear if NZ First can gazump Paliament but by golly its interesting. :D |
Winston001 (3612) | ||
| 1396275 | 2015-03-13 18:49:00 | Right Winston, I understand now. I took the wrong meaning from the passage. | Terry Porritt (14) | ||
| 1396276 | 2015-03-13 21:19:00 | No one is perfect.:eek: What about ya mate John Key ? He seems to be able to do no wrong ? | wainuitech (129) | ||
| 1 2 3 | |||||