| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 139246 | 2015-04-01 03:13:00 | Mark Lundy found guilty | Zippity (58) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1397772 | 2015-04-01 03:13:00 | Who expected that? www.nzherald.co.nz |
Zippity (58) | ||
| 1397773 | 2015-04-01 03:17:00 | Me. I have ever since his performance at the funeral | plod (107) | ||
| 1397774 | 2015-04-01 03:17:00 | Good job, guilty as sin | PeterQ (16315) | ||
| 1397775 | 2015-04-01 03:30:00 | After being on a Jury a few times I would like to hear all the facts not only what we have drip fed through the papers Even being on a Jury you don't get told the full story,you only have too make a decision on the facts given |
Lawrence (2987) | ||
| 1397776 | 2015-04-01 05:00:00 | Like so guilty with bells on | prefect (6291) | ||
| 1397777 | 2015-04-01 06:32:00 | I’m undecided having not heard all the evidence 1st hand. However, I was somewhat shocked when the prosecution opened by saying they were changing the evidence as to the time of Mrs Lundy and the daughter’s death to better suit a new train of events. Seems it is OK in this country to manipulate evidence to suit your needs, if you’re the Police or Prosecution. :rolleyes: |
B.M. (505) | ||
| 1397778 | 2015-04-01 07:23:00 | I'm also undecided wasn't there to hear the evidence at either trial | gary67 (56) | ||
| 1397779 | 2015-04-01 07:45:00 | I'm also undecided wasn't there to hear the evidence at either trial If you want to get away with it dont over act at the funeral. |
prefect (6291) | ||
| 1397780 | 2015-04-01 09:00:00 | I don't understand the Defence claim that Lundy couldn't drive from Petone to Palmerston North and back on a tank of fuel . Maybe I missed something, so was it because his Ford didn't have enough petrol in the tank at that time, or were they saying he couldn't drive 300 or so kilometres on one tank of petrol, therefore he would have run out of gas before he got back to his Motel? It is old history now, he's back where he belongs, but it seems to me that there were a few loose ends in the defence case . Cheers Billy 8-{) |
Billy T (70) | ||
| 1397781 | 2015-04-01 09:18:00 | I don't understand the Defence claim that Lundy couldn't drive from Petone to Palmerston North and back on a tank of fuel. Maybe I missed something, so was it because his Ford didn't have enough petrol in the tank at that time, or were they saying he couldn't drive 300 or so kilometres on one tank of petrol, therefore he would have run out of gas before he got back to his Motel? It is old history now, he's back where he belongs, but it seems to me that there were a few loose ends in the defence case. Cheers Billy 8-{) That got me as well, defence said 71lt wasn't enough for a return trip |
plod (107) | ||
| 1 2 3 | |||||