| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 74093 | 2006-11-11 08:46:00 | Go Large: Anyone had acceptable p2p speeds? | Kindel (6640) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 498142 | 2006-12-06 09:14:00 | My Issue is what with the attitude of these IP people stating. P2P Sharing is not a prority. I think they need to get over it and sought it. Its a downlaod for gods sake. Steve:horrified |
pluto1 (11433) | ||
| 498143 | 2006-12-06 12:22:00 | Bleh my P2P speeds ranges from 4-29kbps. Most of the time around 5-12kbps though. *sighs* I wonder when NZ will finally have decent broadband. :( | qazwsxokmijn (102) | ||
| 498144 | 2006-12-06 18:42:00 | I'm on Go Large, and I'm getting > 100kBytes/sec on private trackers. But if you are getting such terrible speed, you might want to consider Xnet. I was with them until last month when I switched to Go Large, and in my experience, they (Xnet) have been the best ISP for P2P. I was constantly getting > 500kBytes/sec on torrents, etc. And considering they have just reduced their pricing, it's never been a better time to switch to them. FS/128k 50GB on Xnet is now only $85.15, while FS/FS 50GB is $101.15. :thumbs: | bonkiebonks (7249) | ||
| 498145 | 2006-12-06 22:15:00 | Wow....anything higher than $49.95 will get me killed though lol.... | qazwsxokmijn (102) | ||
| 498146 | 2006-12-06 23:18:00 | *sighs* I wonder when NZ will finally have decent broadband. :( No offence, but have you every thought that p2p could be the cause of why we have crappy broadband?, as p2p does take a far bit of bandwidth to use & does slow down thing for other people. |
stu161204 (123) | ||
| 498147 | 2006-12-07 02:07:00 | No offence, but have you every thought that p2p could be the cause of why we have crappy broadband?, as p2p does take a far bit of bandwidth to use & does slow down thing for other people. What comes down to it though is if Telecom couldn't support it they shouldn't of given us more speed/bandwidth untill they upgraded the network. Telecom will block P2P/BT soon enough like other ISP's have but that just gives telecom enough reason to not upgrade. |
trinsic (6945) | ||
| 498148 | 2006-12-14 19:21:00 | I've got international down/up speeds of about 128/128kbps. Very bad. Just wondering though: If I uses uTorrent I <5Kb/s then it drops to 0.0, with no connections to peers; but if I use Azureus I get 5-10Kb/s and it stays, at least as far as I've watched it. What's the difference between these 2 programs and does it help explain the Go Large problems? Obviously both of theses speeds are bollocks by anyone's standard... |
MyCsPiTTa (11434) | ||
| 498149 | 2006-12-14 19:54:00 | If you are useing a router open up a port range from 6881 to 6999 these are the ports that trackers use. Trevor :) |
Trev (427) | ||
| 498150 | 2006-12-14 22:31:00 | On the Go Large, the DO have Traffic Shaping enabled... BUT it is ONLY during the peak hours (4pm till midnight) I have seen this (and I have asked numerous Xtra BB techs) cause my downloads are running at 120K (which is the best we really get on HTTP as well...) off peak and then peak comes and... bang they drop down to like 20K if I am lucky... but I use the scheduler in uTorrent to stop it during the peak times anyway Not true. My connection is being shaped 24hours. Download speeds are still unacceptable after 1am, 3hours to download 100M. Its now 11.30am & download speed is 8kbs. It not my end thats the problem as my speeds were good before switching to GoLarge. (Not the Xtra helpdesk would give you wrong or misleading info) |
steveroby (9470) | ||
| 498151 | 2006-12-14 22:38:00 | Mate, I often get 500 *BYTES* these days.... | qazwsxokmijn (102) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 | |||||