| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 74440 | 2006-11-22 21:26:00 | Civ4 Tin Box edition... what?? | mejobloggs (264) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 501213 | 2006-11-24 02:03:00 | We should have PressF1 FreeCiv competitions using Civ2 rules :) | mejobloggs (264) | ||
| 501214 | 2006-11-24 02:22:00 | Really? Civ3 better? Warlords worth getting? Yes Civ II was addictive and I played and played it . I saw the first screen shot of Civ III and that was it I had to get it . I did, but my old PC and K2-300/64MB was just too slow . It was my justification to upgrade to my new PC three years ago, with 512 MB, etc . I then got Medieval TW and was then playing that for over 2 years or so, before I got Civ IV . I was really disappointed, partly because I could not play the largest map sizes, because I did not have enough RAM . Still it made for quick games (i . e . under 3 hours) . So in summary, Civ 2 -> Civ 3 - Excellent, especially with the new PC :D Civ 3 -> Civ 4 - Good, but I had seen MTW and RTW in between, which lessoned the impact for me . I now have the Warlords Edition and it adds a few more units, civilisations and maps . Is it worth getting ? - If you are a Civ player then, Yes . :thumbs: |
KiwiTT_NZ (233) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||