| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 139716 | 2015-06-16 08:53:00 | More Blatant Racism & Separatism in NZ | B.M. (505) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1402843 | 2015-06-17 05:20:00 | Awww, poor wee Z, lost again.:lol: | KarameaDave (15222) | ||
| 1402844 | 2015-06-17 05:54:00 | Obviously noone read this today (www.nzherald.co.nz) Everyone was entitled to the compliance, not just Maori drivers, he said. "[The document] is probably not worded as well as it can be. "There's two parts to this: the compliance is for everyone, including Maori, and it is about making sure there's less deaths on the road, less crashes," Mr Tims said. |
Speedy Gonzales (78) | ||
| 1402845 | 2015-06-17 06:29:00 | Obviously noone read this today (www.nzherald.co.nz) Everyone was entitled to the compliance, not just Maori drivers, he said. "[The document] is probably not worded as well as it can be. "There's two parts to this: the compliance is for everyone, including Maori, and it is about making sure there's less deaths on the road, less crashes," Mr Tims said. I think that police discretion in something like this is well known. But if police were only ever applying it to whites, wouldn't everyone else - right so - claim racism? The article and documents make it sound like police are being instructed to apply discretion almost always when the driver is Maori. In fact, it sounds quite like they have the discretion to ticket them, but the standard practise is not to do so. I have no problem with police discretion on something like this, but it sounds like it is being applied in a racist way, with the purpose of having statistically lower Maori offending rates. That I have a problem with. I think you'll find the document was worded exactly how it was intended. |
Nick G (16709) | ||
| 1402846 | 2015-06-17 06:29:00 | Obviously noone read this today (www.nzherald.co.nz) Everyone was entitled to the compliance, not just Maori drivers, he said. "[The document] is probably not worded as well as it can be. "There's two parts to this: the compliance is for everyone, including Maori, and it is about making sure there's less deaths on the road, less crashes," Mr Tims said. Hogwash, I don't believe this for a second. They are back-tracking now because they got caught. Heads should roll for this. |
DeSade (984) | ||
| 1402847 | 2015-06-17 06:48:00 | And do not forget the trout affair. | Cicero (40) | ||
| 1402848 | 2015-06-17 07:08:00 | Awww, poor wee Z, lost again.:lol: Actually he showed you two clowns up with his calmness. |
prefect (6291) | ||
| 1402849 | 2015-06-17 07:28:00 | 'tis a fascinating, surreal world you live in Prefect. Perhaps a change in meds? |
KarameaDave (15222) | ||
| 1402850 | 2015-06-17 08:13:00 | Actually he showed you two clowns up with his calmness. Well he is your :wub so you'd say that. 6530 But please answer this: Why is it that when asked to provide proof of a comment do you both often refuse or ignore ? (Using your own words) Often you two clowns make statements and think they are fact. All that has to be written ( similar wording) is "its my Opinion -----" and there's no reason to question it, as its an opinion. Simply put you both hate it when someone questions your comments. Just like today -- National had made some comments accusing labor of doing some bribes over sheep export - Labor produced the facts /paperwork --OOPS Egg on Nationals face. And heres teh proof /article to backup the statement. www.stuff.co.nz |
wainuitech (129) | ||
| 1402851 | 2015-06-17 08:29:00 | NOT FEELING THE LOVE IN THIS THREAD! OK, keep it nice and leave the personal digs alone. Thanks. At least no one has mentioned the Germans yet... |
Jen (38) | ||
| 1402852 | 2015-06-17 08:34:00 | At least no one has mentioned the Germans yet... But now you have :p |
pcuser42 (130) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | |||||