| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 76696 | 2007-02-13 00:24:00 | Why buy Vista when XP can look the same.. | paulw (1826) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 524242 | 2007-02-14 23:43:00 | Chill, was it a free laptop perchance? | Murray P (44) | ||
| 524243 | 2007-02-15 06:41:00 | Looks like those of you who use xp and such will have to download these updates as microsoft has found some more flaws. I have clicked on my update button three time and because im running vista it says i dont need it cause im fully up to date without requiring these latest security updates. I told you Vista was more secure. heres the article. www.stuff.co.nz |
Hitech (9024) | ||
| 524244 | 2007-02-15 06:44:00 | Looks like those of you who use xp and such will have to download these updates as microsoft has found some more flaws. I have clicked on my update button three time and because im running vista it says i dont need it cause im fully up to date without requiring these latest security updates. I told you Vista was more secure. heres the article. www.stuff.co.nz Next thing you will be telling me that Sky TV is transmitting in HD :-) |
paulw (1826) | ||
| 524245 | 2007-02-15 06:47:00 | Yes i will be telling you that in 2008 cause it will be transmitting then they have already made that announcement in a few media releases late last year. Where have you been. |
Hitech (9024) | ||
| 524246 | 2007-02-15 06:59:00 | So, Vista IS more secure. (Where can I buy Vista for $10? :D) | pcuser42 (130) | ||
| 524247 | 2007-02-15 07:24:00 | Yes i read that too but you misread it those copies were pirated by obviously using a dvd writer and still no one has cracked vista yet. | Hitech (9024) | ||
| 524248 | 2007-02-15 07:46:00 | Yes i read that too but you misread it those copies were pirated by obviously using a dvd writer and still no one has cracked vista yet. Wrong, it has been. |
Speedy Gonzales (78) | ||
| 524249 | 2007-02-15 08:23:00 | I know its been done in more than one way. Vista is *MORE* secure, but not *TOTALLY* secure... I mean heck, its an improvement, but not all that much. But this thread is on how Vista looks, and not on how secure it is. Looks nicer? Yes! More fluff that nobody really needs that only slows down the OS as a whole and beefing up the minimum sys requirements meaning less people can run it? Yes! Can linux / mac do better on less resources? Yes! |
Chilling_Silence (9) | ||
| 524250 | 2007-02-15 08:45:00 | Microsoft Vista Has Enormous Gaping Hole ( . theinquirer . net/default . aspx?article=37619" target="_blank">www . theinquirer . net) . Well kinda, a slight whiff of desperation to that one, but not bad going this early on . What I liked the most though, is the all-in-one admission/retraction/denial/design choice (aka a security "FEATURE") :lol: They're burning rubber with their spin . Shouldn't be too harsh though, you'll be ok with Onekare and Windows Defender ( . theinquirer . net/default . aspx?article=37629" target="_blank">www . theinquirer . net) doing it's bit in typical fashion to keep the spooks at bay . Ok, so I told a little fib . . . . now listen verrry carefully, that MS rated critical flaw affects VISTA too . |
Murray P (44) | ||
| 524251 | 2007-02-15 08:51:00 | I told you Vista was more secure. I wouldnt be so sure... www.theinquirer.net |
Chilling_Silence (9) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 | |||||