Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 139841 2015-07-07 05:47:00 Government 'Fudging' or a new Tuis Ad? ruup (1827) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
1404277 2015-07-08 00:10:00 btw, it was labor who where the initial cause of the whole thing, Nat were left to tidy up the mess. Shows how useless that national really is then if they really wanted to do something doesn't it.

National have been the govt leaders since 2008, that's 7 Years so far, and they haven't done anything about it ?? Why should they if it benefits them which it obviously does.
wainuitech (129)
1404278 2015-07-08 02:22:00 "btw, it was labor who where the initial cause of the whole thing, Nat were left to tidy up the mess."

Show me some proof,what you have written is BULLSHIT,Key tried to spin that but do some research and you will find that is was just another of his many LIES.

www.radionz.co.nz

www.radionz.co.nz

www.parliament.nz


Show me some proof that the original statement was BULLSHIT,,,,,,,
Zippity (58)
1404279 2015-07-08 02:42:00 Your Prime Minister tried to blame the Labour party for this mess using a document which he said would implicate it,when asked to produce it he would not (after several requests by the labour party).Labour then managed to set a copy of the letter introduced into Parliament (had parts blacked out).PM went very silent on the matter.A full copy was then read by Barry Soper who reported....

But yours truly has been able to lift the blacked out bits and have a squizz beneath them. Having read the naughty bits, it begged the question, why they were blacked out at all, given the papers told us little more than the axing of the live sheep trade didn't go down well in Riyadh and that it could affect the outcome of the free trade agreement with the region? Now that was hardly a reason for keeping it from our prying eyes.

There was no mention of the threat from the Saudi businessman that he was thinking of taking legal action. Certainly he wasn't happy the live sheep trade had been stopped, given that he'd invested a lot of money in it and the papers do show the Saudis may have been led to believe the trade could be resumed.

Now you can see why the Tories weren't interested in releasing the papers, they didn't fit their spin!

If you read this link it will indicate where the Labour party was trying to table the item that John Key was trying to bluff them with...seems to have worked with some people!

www.parliament.nz

Now where is your proof?
ruup (1827)
1404280 2015-07-08 04:52:00 [I]But yours truly has been able to lift the blacked out bits and have a squizz beneath them.....................

And you believe that?!

Ha Ha. You are more of a fool I gave you credit for........
Zippity (58)
1404281 2015-07-08 05:03:00 Hey Rupp-- When you asked
Now where is your proof? Please Don't hold your breath waiting, :p

you wont get a straight answer , often comes back with some sort of non answer to a question (just like a politician answer) , WHY ? Simple cant or wont provide one if it means proven incorrect. ;)
wainuitech (129)
1404282 2015-07-08 05:09:00 And you believe that?!

Ha Ha. You are more of a fool I gave you credit for........

If I'm a fool.....what the F**k does that make you?
ruup (1827)
1404283 2015-07-08 05:38:00 Have you ever said anything complimentary about National in your lifetime, or are you a stanuch Labour/Green supporter? :D

Affiliations and/or political loyalties are irrelevant in this matter.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, you can safely say that it is, indeed, a Duck.

At this stage the aforementioned politician is definitely quacking, politics notwithstanding.

Cheers

Billy 8-{) :stare:
Billy T (70)
1404284 2015-07-08 05:39:00 So you are trying to tell us that Soper was given an original copy of a document that had some of the original text blacked out and he was able to remove the blackening?

To be able to remove the "blacked out" portion of the text, he would have had to be given a copy of the original, unedited documemt, which had been censored before posting to him.

Get off the bloody grass......
Zippity (58)
1404285 2015-07-08 05:47:00 So you are trying to tell us that Soper was given an original copy of a document that had some of the original text blacked out and he was able to remove the blackening?

To be able to remove the "blacked out" portion of the text, he would have had to be given a copy of the original, unedited documemt, which had been censored before posting to him.

Get off the bloody grass......

Yes he saw and read an original copy uncensored....read the article...I think your the one on the grass mate.Typical National supporter,playing the man not the ball....
ruup (1827)
1404286 2015-07-08 12:14:00 Dream on...... Zippity (58)
1 2 3