| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 139801 | 2015-06-30 22:31:00 | ...and they called David Cunliffe 'tricky' | ruup (1827) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1403951 | 2015-07-01 02:48:00 | Sorry mate it is you who are blind!....I don't give a toss who is in power,be it National or what is currently called the Labour party.To trumpet that 'Hey look at us how great we are..." and to then take by stealth without making any comment is in fact a double standard. Please try stop labeling me and others as lefties or labour rites.I am not,have never been and will never be a member of the Labour party.I am just someone who sees things that are happening and calls them.So instead of moaning,try and counter the argument, your National party labeled David Cunlife as tricky,so what does this make Bill English? Why dont you go be a politician then? Sometimes Govts have to make difficult decisions. I may not agree with ALL of National policies, but sure as hell dont agree with any of Labours or the Greens. |
SolMiester (139) | ||
| 1403952 | 2015-07-01 04:25:00 | Dave, I think it's a pretty poor article, and doesn't really say a lot, and the whole point of it is a bit of Nat bashing. They're plenty of valid things to bash them about, but this isn't one of them imo :p And if you look at my posts in politically/environmentally related threads, I'm not exactly a diehard National fan. Also, just because I think it's a terrible article, doesn't mean I don't think they should have the right to write it. However, I have the right to say I think it's a load of drivel, and no one should take much notice of it. :thumbs: Nick: I think you are under the misapprehension that my comments were directed at you. They were not, it was number 1101 I was quoting in that post.... You are reasonably unbiased and generally make valid points, I don't consider you a one eyed National loony by any means. I hope this clears up your misgivings re my post. :thumbs: |
KarameaDave (15222) | ||
| 1403953 | 2015-07-01 06:08:00 | Nick: I think you are under the misapprehension that my comments were directed at you. They were not, it was number 1101 I was quoting in that post.... You are reasonably unbiased and generally make valid points, I don't consider you a one eyed National loony by any means. I hope this clears up your misgivings re my post. :thumbs: Whoops, wasn't paying enough attention. Apologies, carry on :) |
Nick G (16709) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||