| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 79440 | 2007-05-20 06:03:00 | Another annoying BSOD error with no apparent cause | Agent_24 (57) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 551340 | 2007-05-20 06:03:00 | I have recently been getting a stupid BSOD error on my sempron machine, It has happened 3 times (with seemingly no relation between what I was doing and when it occurred) The message is always the same: IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL Stop: 0x0000000A (0x00000016, 0x00000002, 0x0000000, 0x804F8E2A) I have recently updated radeon drivers to 7.4, and added the new 17" monitor. apart from that nothing has changed for quite a while. Any ideas on what this could be before I start trying to do crazy stuff to my drivers? :lol: |
Agent_24 (57) | ||
| 551341 | 2007-05-20 07:06:00 | Do a driver roll back on your video drivers. Also check your event viewer log! |
apsattv (7406) | ||
| 551342 | 2007-05-20 08:08:00 | Or uninstall the drivers and do a search for drivercleaner pro, so it'll get rid of all traces of the driver/s. Then reinstall the drivers. |
Speedy Gonzales (78) | ||
| 551343 | 2007-05-23 05:41:00 | I uninstalled the drivers, then ran drivercleaner pro, re-installed with 7.2 drivers and guess what?? IT JUST DID IT AGAIN :mad: Event viewer doesn't provide anything other than what the BSOD itself says, there is no driver listed or anything, the message is exactly the same as it was the other 3 times. |
Agent_24 (57) | ||
| 551344 | 2007-05-23 05:44:00 | The is an apparent cause: IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL. What could be clearer and more selfexplanatory? :D |
Graham L (2) | ||
| 551345 | 2007-05-23 05:52:00 | The is an apparent cause: IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL. What could be clearer and more selfexplanatory? :D Well since it's so clear to you, what's the answer then? :rolleyes: |
Agent_24 (57) | ||
| 551346 | 2007-05-23 05:56:00 | Do you really want to know? Somewhere down in the lower intestines of the OS there is a variable which has been given a value which is larger than a limit which is set somewhere else in the OS. Where are these numbers stored? Who knows? Probably noone in Microsoft knows, either. But whenever this happens, they give you a good error message. Isn't it fun? :thumbs: |
Graham L (2) | ||
| 551347 | 2007-05-23 06:09:00 | Do you really want to know? Where are these numbers stored? Who knows? Probably noone in Microsoft knows, either. But whenever this happens, they give you a good error message. Isn't it fun? :thumbs: If there is a window handy now would be good time to send something through it. :D |
winmacguy (3367) | ||
| 551348 | 2007-05-23 06:39:00 | Sorry Agent24, if I've been not treating it as seriously as you might wish. ;) But you musn't take computers too seriously.:badpc: I've just done a bit of a search of the forum, and it seems that this can indicate a memory problem. Memtest86 would be worth trying. |
Graham L (2) | ||
| 551349 | 2007-05-23 06:39:00 | Do you really want to know? Somewhere down in the lower intestines of the OS there is a variable which has been given a value which is larger than a limit which is set somewhere else in the OS . Where are these numbers stored? Who knows? Probably noone in Microsoft knows, either . But whenever this happens, they give you a good error message . Isn't it fun? :thumbs: Thank you for that precise and definite answer . . . . :lol: And it just happened again . Would the numbers being consistently consistent mean anything? Ok, so what's the best way to go about dealing with the damn thing? |
Agent_24 (57) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 | |||||