| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 141701 | 2016-02-07 01:35:00 | Avast | jayal (1291) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1415628 | 2016-02-07 01:35:00 | is there a problem with "avast?" -I had trouble updating and then re-installing - gave up in the end, deleted it, would only go/leave in safe mode, then installed "AVG" no problem there. Is there a compatibility problem between anti virus programmes? Oddly, recently "Ad-aware" was being difficult. I deleted all traces then reinstalled. | jayal (1291) | ||
| 1415629 | 2016-02-07 02:46:00 | You should never have two or maoe antivirus programs installed as they often will fight one another and in the end both are not working. Antimalware programs can generally be combined, but anything that's active all the time can detect other programs as infections. |
wainuitech (129) | ||
| 1415630 | 2016-02-07 03:01:00 | thanks Wainuitech. I guess I should"ve known that, so AVG should be sufficient cover. Any difference between AVG & Ad-Aware | jayal (1291) | ||
| 1415631 | 2016-02-07 04:24:00 | They will be different, but whether one is better than the other??? antivirus.softwareinsider.com If you want a good Anti-Virus get Eset Nod32 |
Driftwood (5551) | ||
| 1415632 | 2016-02-08 20:10:00 | Dont have AV & anti-malware or adaware etc running at the same time What actually happens is, they both detect the same malware, one will lock it stopping the other from cleaning it & vice versa, so neither can do their job. Some of the free (and pay) AV programs now try & be all singing all dancing make the coffee type of programs : they really are a mess. AVG now being one of the more bloated messes. |
1101 (13337) | ||
| 1415633 | 2016-02-08 20:50:00 | I'd avoid AVG given their history of flagging Windows files as infected. No problems here with Avast. Have it running on a couple of machines - though I only install the file scanning module and leave the rest out ;) |
autechre (266) | ||
| 1 | |||||