| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 81581 | 2007-08-01 02:56:00 | e6600 Temp. | Jams (1051) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 574843 | 2007-08-13 22:10:00 | That is to save power and heat etc. Do you know what the stock voltage is and the voltage when it reduces the speed? |
The_End_Of_Reality (334) | ||
| 574844 | 2007-08-14 06:09:00 | I'VE WON. OMG, I'VE WON!!! Went back to the shop and took a different approach to it. He lent me a whole e6320 system to take home and throw my e6600 in to test. Without my Zalman, case airflow and arctic silver, my e6600 idles at 69.C in the other system!!!! So i put the e6320 in my system with my cooling and it is RIGHT NOW sitting at 23.C while im chatting and surfing. Im going back tomorrow to tell him that my e6600 is funked! Cheers guys for all your input and help, much appreciated! |
Jams (1051) | ||
| 574845 | 2007-08-14 08:13:00 | anandtech.com Your article uses "NVIDIA nTune 5.05.22.00 (1/16/2007)" to read temps which is TCase It also said """but the chipset-specific features do not operate as they should. Idle temperatures in TAT were in line with measured idle temps with NVIDIA Monitor. The CPU stress testing with TAT pushing both cores showed TAT stress temps at ***80%**** CPU usage roughly"""" *** means important bit so you can see it more clearly :) You are trying comparing a Tcase temp to a Tjunction temp, actually worse a Tcase to inaccurate Tjunction temp by there own admission. I am a long term overclocker that gets frustrated with noobs blindly quoting/comparing temps without understanding them and misleading others. I even gave you a guide to understand and you are still arguing, nice one :thumbs: Battleneter, I fail to understand where you have me stating what the POSTER was using for his temps, he gave me a figure, I gave him comparative temps. Dont start calling people noobs, who the hell do you think you are?. I too have been clocking chip since the original Pentium..... Just for your info, 80 minus difference between your Tcase & Tjuntion is still way higher than what the poster originally had in his post. ***, what a D**khead Why dont you read the posters last post, the chip wasnt at the correct temp for the cooler he was using! |
SolMiester (139) | ||
| 574846 | 2007-08-14 08:23:00 | If that is the case I would say that it has a faulty temp sensor, if you touch the heatsink, is it hot? (it may well be so take caution :p ) | The_End_Of_Reality (334) | ||
| 574847 | 2007-08-14 08:43:00 | Zalman Tcase 36 load /80*100 = 45c Tjunction .......yet he stated over 55c...To me that is a big difference considering he has a lower spec'd cpu... YOU understand now! |
SolMiester (139) | ||
| 574848 | 2007-08-15 04:31:00 | Just got back from the place i got it from. Hahaha. Far out, it went better than what i could of hoped for... I took my CPU and the system i was lent, back into the shop. I ended up having to upgrade the BIOS in the 6320 system so it would read my e6600 CPU properly. CPU Idle in the 6320 system with my 6600 = 48.C CPU 100% Load in the 6320 system with my 6600 = 70.C Rang up Intel. Explained everything for about an hour, asking if we had tried different things. I had tired : re-seating 3 different heatsinks. Different Thermal paste 2 completely different systems BIOS Upgrades. After all this, it sounds like it will be replaced. But first i have to wait for Intel to send over some paper work and then send my e6600 back to them :S. So I'm going to be without a ****ing CPU why they piss arse around testing it only to find that it is faulty. (I'm expecting them to find some way out of it). So here's hoping that Intel are going to be a bunch of good bastards and replace it. |
Jams (1051) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 | |||||