| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 84658 | 2007-11-14 03:13:00 | Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 more expensive than the E6750? | Caesius (3758) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 611322 | 2007-11-14 03:13:00 | Everywhere I look online the E6600 is more costly than the E6750, why is this? 2.4 vs 2.66 GHz, E6600 and E6750 respectively. Why? |
Caesius (3758) | ||
| 611323 | 2007-11-14 03:38:00 | Maybe this will explain: www.tomshardware.com | beeswax34 (63) | ||
| 611324 | 2007-11-14 05:11:00 | That's timely I'm about to get a new system built around a E6750 on an ASUS P5KR motherboard so it looks like I made the right choice. Particularly happy that the E6750 seems to run at a lot lower temperatures than my current Pentium 4 3.0ghz |
TeejayR (4271) | ||
| 611325 | 2007-11-14 05:19:00 | The E6750 is an excellent CPU. Overclocked it 3.2GHz rock solid and stable at only 5 degree rise from 15 to 20 with stock cooling and voltage. | qazwsxokmijn (102) | ||
| 611326 | 2007-11-14 06:33:00 | The E6750 is a newer chip than the E6600 and thus its likely cheaper simply because its more available. The E6750 would have likely received price cuts since its launch as its a current chip whereas the E6600 wouldn't | Pete O'Neil (6584) | ||
| 1 | |||||