| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 85383 | 2007-12-08 11:51:00 | Integrated graphics card vs dedicated graphics card | Ninjabear (2948) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 619218 | 2007-12-08 11:51:00 | Does anybody know of a image or a short clip of a comparison between an integrated graphics card and a graphics card by itself.I think it is called dedicated graphics card A dedicated graphics card For Example ATi X800 etc.. |
Ninjabear (2948) | ||
| 619219 | 2007-12-08 18:59:00 | Take a look at Graphics on Toms Hardware. | pctek (84) | ||
| 619220 | 2007-12-08 19:45:00 | Does anybody know of a image or a short clip of a comparison between an integrated graphics card and a graphics card by itself.I think it is called dedicated graphics card A dedicated graphics card For Example ATi X800 etc..You'd struggle to get any meaningful information from a comparison of one card vs one integrated because of the enormous range of card performances and types. |
Greg (193) | ||
| 619221 | 2007-12-08 19:57:00 | tom hardware had a test on intergrated gpu ages ago. basicly intergrated is almost always the bottom spec chips. designed for basic use (not gaming!) sometimes you can get onboard graphics thats actually a fairly topend model but they are rare. |
tweak'e (69) | ||
| 619222 | 2007-12-09 11:52:00 | Does anybody know of a image or a short clip of a comparison between an integrated graphics card and a graphics card by itself.I think it is called dedicated graphics card A dedicated graphics card For Example ATi X800 etc.. what for? comparison for purchase between a low end dedicated and integrated or what? as a general rule of thumb, integrated is useless. often a google search of the the two models of interest and maybe the word "benchmark" will yield fruitful results |
motorbyclist (188) | ||
| 619223 | 2007-12-09 12:00:00 | An $80 low end card will beat most integrated video chipsets. | apsattv (7406) | ||
| 619224 | 2007-12-10 02:24:00 | Dedicated -Dedicated and singled out (performs by itself) -Has it's own dedicated video RAM -Alot more powerful in comparison due to being singled out -Cheap low end cards more powerful than most integrated Integrated -RAM hogging (sometimes uses system RAM) -Very tiny and powerless due to being small and mounted -Used to save LOTS of money |
CaptainVincent (76) | ||
| 619225 | 2007-12-10 03:55:00 | Integrated is crap! never even think about playing anything with an integrated chipset | MaXimus (13013) | ||
| 619226 | 2007-12-10 04:57:00 | What used to be believed is not necessarily true with the latest motherboards. I have just assembled a Vista Aero machine using 1 GB of integrated video [800MHz DDR2 dual channel] that knocks the socks of a machine I assembled 3 months ago that has a fairly costly PCI Express card that glitches, every now and then, on start-up. |
PENTIUM (426) | ||
| 619227 | 2007-12-10 05:23:00 | beats it in what? in a 2d Windows environment! or in a 3D game? you must be kidding | MaXimus (13013) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||