Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 52358 2004-12-17 04:09:00 Quick Reply - what's the diffs? Greg (193) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
304350 2004-12-17 04:09:00 I see a lot of people raving over this feature, but never tried it - when I click the button it seems to be no quicker than a regular reply.www.pressf1.co.nz Greg (193)
304351 2004-12-17 04:13:00 It saves time by not loading up the message compose page.

Just type in the box and send.....rather then hit reply,load page,type msg,hit send.

I supose its debatable if the half second saved is worthy of being called quick,but then the 56k'ers may reap the full benifit.

Even if they are second class citizens....... :D
Metla (12)
304352 2004-12-17 04:15:00 It doesn't come with the extra bells and whistles like emoticons, font selection etc,etc.
It might save time by not calling them up.
When you decide you need all those things you can use the Go Advanced button. Or put the codes in manually. :D

Of course quick replies are sometimes a bad thing. A few moments of thinking sometimes saves time. ;-)
Graham L (2)
304353 2004-12-17 04:44:00 It saves time by not loading up the message compose page.

Just type in the box and send.....rather then hit reply,load page,type msg,hit send.

I supose its debatable if the half second saved is worthy of being called quick,but then the 56k'ers may reap the full benifit.

Even if they are second class citizens....... :D

If you keep this humour up Met,I will get you a job on stage and not the next one out of town :D
Cicero (40)
304354 2004-12-17 06:20:00 As it suggests, it's quicker :p Saves on loading time. I love it :) ~sy~ (95)
304355 2004-12-17 06:21:00 It doesn't come with the extra bells and whistles like emoticons, font selection etc,etc.


Emoticons are working... :stare:
~sy~ (95)
304356 2004-12-17 06:24:00 And working well :D R2x1 (4628)
1