Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 54753 2005-02-21 07:42:00 Do you have Sky? manicminer (4219) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
327052 2005-02-21 08:35:00 if i could afford sky i would go and spend it on broadband internet use ! ! ! tweak'e (69)
327053 2005-02-21 09:00:00 Do you have Sky? Digital or UHF? If not, why not? Too expensive? A load of rubbish? No time to watch it?



no, have saturn insted :-)
robsonde (120)
327054 2005-02-21 09:31:00 Nah, used to but it wasn't worth the money, and they kept making stupid billing mistakes. george12 (7)
327055 2005-02-21 09:55:00 Nah, don't have Sky! The club next door has it, so they pay for it, I enjoy it.

Won't get it for home until they set up the captions/subtitles service, which should not bee too long.
mister harbies (5607)
327056 2005-02-21 10:45:00 no, have saturn insted :-)

Ditto Derek. Saturn via cable with, 1234, Sky sport, movies, history, etc, all coming the same way. No reception issues as a rule. Haven't bothered to find out if this is digital or not, would assume it was but probably converted back to analogue in the set top box.
Murray P (44)
327057 2005-02-21 10:56:00 My reasons for *No* are identical to Prescott's, except that I'd pick the History channel instead of Movies. Laura (43)
327058 2005-02-21 11:43:00 Money better spent on fast internet with large caps. Then you can download what content you want to watch and miss all the crap. ;) E|im (87)
327059 2005-02-21 18:27:00 No.

Some content desirable, but overall too expensive.

Billy 8-{)
Billy T (70)
327060 2005-02-21 21:03:00 No, rarely watch the TV, if there was any money spare around here I'd get something better than dial up. Sue (33)
327061 2005-02-21 21:16:00 No, again too expensive. If you want the startup package + movies you are looking at $62/month. For the amount of time you spend watching television you wouldn't ever get your money's worth, well at least I wouldn't. Jen (38)
1 2 3 4 5 6