| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 55632 | 2005-03-15 10:37:00 | Best Sci-Fi Films You Have Seen | vinref (6194) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 334452 | 2005-03-16 00:41:00 | Matrix, Matrix Reloaded, Matrix Revolution. all 3 kick ass. People dont like the 2nd and the thrid becuase the mystery is gone. the 1st found Neo which was the adventure. Spot on, Jams!!! |
Strommer (42) | ||
| 334453 | 2005-03-16 03:49:00 | [Matrix, Matrix Reloaded, Matrix Revolution. all 3 kick ass. People dont like the 2nd and the thrid becuase the mystery is gone. the 1st found Neo which was the adventure. Spot on, Jams!!! Really? Matrix 1 was okay because it broke special effects barriers and partially interesting storyline. Was there any real reason for the following two? You can't go past classics like 'Tron' and even 'Total Recall', also can't forget the first three Star Wars (4,5,6). |
Veale (536) | ||
| 334454 | 2005-03-16 08:05:00 | Really? Matrix 1 was okay because it broke special effects barriers and partially interesting storyline . Was there any real reason for the following two? You can't go past classics like 'Tron' and even 'Total Recall', also can't forget the first three Star Wars (4,5,6) . TRON :eek: Total Recall :horrified The first three Star Wars :thumbs: |
the highlander (245) | ||
| 334455 | 2005-03-16 08:08:00 | The Running Man. Logans Run. Though I haven't watched either for 15 odd years, so they may be crap If i remember rightly i had The Running Man game on my Amiga 500, it stank. |
Metla (12) | ||
| 334456 | 2005-03-16 09:04:00 | Barbarella. Queen of the Galaxy. Yum!!! :D Did you know that science fiction started to go downhill around the time that its popular name changed from SF to Sci-Fi ?? |
paradox (1082) | ||
| 334457 | 2005-03-16 09:15:00 | Whats that movie called actress is will smith where the robots rebelled agai-nst humans?Wanna watch that.But forgotteh the name so my dad can buy it on vcd | Ninjabear (2948) | ||
| 334458 | 2005-03-16 12:36:00 | Apart from Terry's post, you guys are all talking about pretty recent stuff by my standards . (After all, the thread says BEST Sci-Fi) So what about the starters? Think 2001:A Space Odyssey? Widescreen magic & a sensation at the end of the late 60s . Slow-moving, but great music . In b/white, the even older Return of the Body Snatchers still intrigues new viewers ( or maybe that's categorised under "horror" nowadays) for its small-town realism mixed with the previously-unimaginable . . And that thing with Charlton Heston & the monkeys will be remembered as a huge novel breakthrough of its time, whereas much recent sci-fi just follows patterns already set . . (OK I confess I haven't seen most of those . So I'm open to argument if I'm wrong) |
Laura (43) | ||
| 334459 | 2005-03-16 18:22:00 | Agree with Laura. How could 2001: A Space Odyssey not be on the list. It achieved enormous fame for its then revolutionary special effects in 1968 and is still considered one of the best Sci-Fi films ever made. |
Safari (3993) | ||
| 334460 | 2005-03-16 19:13:00 | Barbarella. Queen of the Galaxy. Yum!!! :D Did you know that science fiction started to go downhill around the time that its popular name changed from SF to Sci-Fi ?? that would be i-robot the original book was way better, very different story to I think |
Morgenmuffel (187) | ||
| 334461 | 2005-03-16 21:07:00 | Star Wars Ep 4 A New hope, Ep 6 return of the jedi. Ep1 sucked , Ep2 Sucked (They didnt look like Victory Class Star Destroyers) Ep5 was a little slow... but I like the fact that the empire sorta gained more than the rebels I didnt mind Star Trek 6: The undiscovered country, and Star Trek Nemesis I liked #6 better, Nemesis emphasised too much on Computer Generated graphics |
bob_doe_nz (92) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | |||||