| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 57799 | 2005-05-13 03:49:00 | why dont we have sigs and avatars? | harvesterofsorrow (6955) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 354689 | 2005-07-20 02:43:00 | no avatar's, period. some of your signatures are hard enough to look at! un-cluttered = easy to read and navigate.. there's enough "going on" design-wise on the forum pages already. appreciate what you guys have been given :annoyed: :dogeye: |
Mary (6534) | ||
| 354690 | 2005-07-20 03:03:00 | Alrighty, Someone needs to give Mary a hug....... :nerd: | Metla (12) | ||
| 354691 | 2005-07-20 03:07:00 | Avatars are just part of the concentration on "presentation" and "image", rather than content, often seen. If you have an avatar, you don't need a personality. (Or rather, if you have no personality, you obviously need an avatar. ;)) Signatures had a reason for being in the newsgroups. They gave your contact details. Sometimes a brief witty quote or ascii-art picture was added. Bandwidth and disk space limitations led to an informal limit of 4 lines for a signature in most newsgroups. Offenders would quickly be asked to change their ways. ;) We have (in the user CP options) the choice of wheteher to display avatars and signatures. I've chosen not to. Just in case. :cool: |
Graham L (2) | ||
| 354692 | 2005-07-20 06:16:00 | Ahh but we do have sigs, you just gotta be imaginative :cool: | Myth (110) | ||
| 354693 | 2005-07-20 07:08:00 | Ahh but we do have sigs, you just gotta be imaginative :cool:imaginative????????? Nooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BTW nicw bit of ascii-art there Tazz! |
personthingy (1670) | ||
| 354694 | 2005-07-20 07:22:00 | With the Intarweb, who needs imagination? | Edward (31) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | |||||