Forum Home
PC World Chat
Thread ID: 58042	2005-05-19 16:26:00	Economic Growth Copyfair IP Laws Proposal	CreightonBrown (5692)	PC World Chat

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
356740	2005-05-19 16:26:00	Someone should draft an economic growth copyright proposal. IP Laws which highlight * Control of copyright/IP laws may have both positive and negative effects to a nation * Without copyright/IP Laws development of the copyright material will not evolve * Copyright material can allow more ability to be performed by the IP Clients to achieve more for themselves, organisational involvement, governmental involvement, world involvement or larger. * With copyright/IP Laws at the control of the IP holder or IP Client, as opposed to national wellbeing, it may be counterproductive to the greater nation or society To achieve IP Law fairness * That reward should be offered for IP development but care should be placed to ensure it does not do disservice to the Ip Holder or IP Client Clients or Economic system * That if it is priced 'out of range' or 'out of compatibility' then it may create undesirable results for both the IP Holder and IP Client * That IP Laws should facilitate both advantage of the IP Holder, IP Client and economy To make suppositions * IP laws should protect the IP holder but not disable reasonably the IP Client and be of benefit to the economy where feasible * IP Clients should protect the IP Client but not disable reasonably the IP Holder and be of benefit to the economy where feasible Licencing Structure Should be balanced so that it is compatible, reasonably, between all IP Holders and IP Clients except in cases where there is concerns for safety or potential damage e.g. export of restricted software to nation or person or organisation which is deemed to have a potentially dangerous ramifications. Licencing Infrastructure Structure of Licencing may need to be changed where it can be made more compatible in both delivery and acceptance such as new pricing structures which does not disable either the IP Holder or IP Client so it can be readily integrated into a larger part of the IP Law infrastructure delivery system. Also Refer: pressf1.pcworld.co.nz	CreightonBrown (5692)
356741	2005-05-20 04:35:00	Do people not want a fair copyright law?	CreightonBrown (5692)
356742	2005-05-20 04:40:00	Don't we have one? As in, All works are copyrighted unless the copyright holder gives specific permission or gives away right to the material to the public domain. Sounds pretty fair to me.	Metla (12)
356743	2005-05-20 04:44:00	Don't we have one? As in, All works are copyrighted unless the copyright holder gives specific permission or gives away right to the material to the public domain. Sounds pretty fair to me. Laws may become modified over time. It does not address: * The discrepencies * Resolutions to the discrepencies * Resolutions which enhance personal, societal, knowledge, governmental or other gains. If you want to discuss this 1] Please state how you feel it does not provide the ability to do more e.g. software which does not facilitate the ability to do something 2] State how we should not be trying to grow or improve upon these discrepencies and why You are welcome to comment, but not degrade comments or people, me or anyone.	CreightonBrown (5692)
356744	2005-05-20 04:54:00	heh? Try and keep the instructions to yourself aye, I most certainly do not need or apreciate the likes of yourself trying to tell me what i can and cannot do. We have mods for that, You are not one of them. Secondly, what the hell are you on about? On second thoughts, Don't answer that, I would hate to see the resulting document if you were asked to elaborate.	Metla (12)
356745	2005-05-20 05:00:00	heh? Try and keep the instructions to yourself aye, I most certainly do not need or apreciate the likes of yourself trying to tell me what i can and cannot do. We have mods for that, You are not one of them. Secondly, what the hell are you on about? On second thoughts, Don't answer that, I would hate to see the resulting document if you were asked to elaborate. If you want to argue my proposal argue it on sound logical grounds: that is either miscontrueled in definition or idea. That is the objective: the discussion of the idea. not personal attacks, not things which deviate the plan, the objective was Economic Growrth Copyfair IP Laws, and in that it is defined as highlighting growth and then how to go about it. For the subject thread to facilitate it one would discuss the issue of how to achieve growth and how not to, that was the objective. It is not to make personal attacks or take away from the topic and discussion intended of this thread.	CreightonBrown (5692)
356746	2005-05-20 05:05:00	I'll type the following v e r y s l o w l y.. w h a t t h e h e l l a r e y o u o n a b o u t ? ?	Metla (12)
356747	2005-05-20 05:25:00	On second thoughts, Don't answer that, I would hate to see the resulting document if you were asked to elaborate. Your a wise man Met's I'll type the following v e r y s l o w l y.. w h a t t h e h e l l a r e y o u o n a b o u t ? ? Now you've gone and blown it, sirry irriot. Actually I think the new copyright laws (is it in yet, when?) which allow fair use copying will be much better than the current law, but still fall well short in allowing only one copy/media shift. Have a stroll though chat to find my view on the RIIA, etc.	Murray P (44)
356748	2005-05-20 05:27:00	I'll type the following v e r y s l o w l y.. w h a t t h e h e l l a r e y o u o n a b o u t ? ? Metla - you may find his home page illuminating ( or otherwise...) TonyF	TonyF (246)
356749	2005-05-20 05:32:00	What the hell has this got to do with asking for advice, or offering advice on a PC related problem Please keep the forum clean and post in Chat or better still post it here www.esatclear.ie She cares!	bartsdadhomer (80)
1 2 3