| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 57999 | 2005-05-18 09:35:00 | Tables websites should die | ad_267 (6193) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 356352 | 2005-05-23 00:52:00 | here's what i see.... sal.neoburn.net Though I do have certain restrictions on my browser, The flashing email button also never happened (god bless proximitron) and I enabled pictures purely for the screenshot. |
Metla (12) | ||
| 356353 | 2005-05-23 01:18:00 | This (sal.neoburn.net) is what I see. If I was you I would beg someone here to tidy it up for you :thumbs: |
Rob99 (151) | ||
| 356354 | 2005-05-23 01:30:00 | What a lot of people don't realise is that using CSS site-wide can actually retard a website's performance in Google's search ranking results. Believe it or not! | Greg (193) | ||
| 356355 | 2005-05-23 02:20:00 | How can that be Greg? The code is far cleaner using CSS, and therefore easier for the bots to index. The CSS only contains code not desired by the bot. Also by having the css on a seperate sheet you reduce the size of the page, and I read, somewhere, (http://seochat.com ?) some bots only index the first 50 lines, less code in the header means more text where the bot can index it. |
netchicken (4843) | ||
| 356356 | 2005-05-23 02:24:00 | What a lot of people don't realise is that using CSS site-wide can actually retard a website's performance in Google's search ranking results. Believe it or not! How? I don't believe it. I always thought that Google looked in the meta keywords, the actual contents and links to and from the site. Google should not really be concerned with layout... It doesn't make sense. |
vinref (6194) | ||
| 356357 | 2005-05-23 02:31:00 | This site report the exact opposite (although I can't comment as to their credability) www.webcredible.co.uk The website of Juicy Studio saw a six-fold increase in site visitors after switching from a table-based layout to a CSS layout. Search engines prefer CSS-based sites and are likely to score them higher in the search rankings because: The code is cleaner and therefore more accessible to search engines Important content can be placed at the top of the HTML document There is a greater density of content compared to coding Using CSS for layout is also highly advantageous for usability, as it leads to significantly faster download times. |
netchicken (4843) | ||
| 356358 | 2005-05-23 02:56:00 | Pay me my $95 fee and I'll elaborate! :D | Greg (193) | ||
| 356359 | 2005-05-23 05:29:00 | What a lot of people don't realise is that using CSS site-wide can actually retard a website's performance in Google's search ranking results. Believe it or not! I very much doubt that. It would probably improve your result in a search seeing as google does not have to sift through all your formatting and tables. |
ad_267 (6193) | ||
| 356360 | 2005-05-23 06:20:00 | This (sal.neoburn.net) is what I see. If I was you I would beg someone here to tidy it up for you :thumbs: Ok! Beg, grovel, pretty please. Price would be good too please. It does look like *&^% on one of those screen shots doesn't it.. :help: |
pctek (84) | ||
| 356361 | 2005-05-23 06:21:00 | I'll pay Greg. Just post here or email me all your credit card details, the money will be there in a flash. Just remember to put https in front of your credit card number to protect it. :D |
Rob99 (151) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | |||||