| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 150539 | 2022-03-22 05:12:00 | If It's Boeing, I Won't Be Going | zqwerty (97) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1485069 | 2022-03-22 05:12:00 | I've said it before as above, but the flight path after the dive looks very similar to the Boeing 737 Max that crashed in the past. www.channelnewsasia.com |
zqwerty (97) | ||
| 1485070 | 2022-03-22 05:22:00 | Apparently it's already been established that this plane didn't have the software onboard that caused the past 2 crashes. | allblack (6574) | ||
| 1485071 | 2022-03-22 05:33:00 | Or hardware. That's just the 737 Max Ken |
kenj (9738) | ||
| 1485072 | 2022-03-22 05:59:00 | I've said it before as above, but the flight path after the dive looks very similar to the Boeing 737 Max that crashed in the past. www.channelnewsasia.com What a pitiful rumormonger :( |
Zippity (58) | ||
| 1485073 | 2022-03-22 06:24:00 | So according to you a plane which has never had a very high crash record (almost perfect in fact) is flying along at 29,000 feet and suddenly goes into a steep dive, pulls up at around 8000 feet briefly recovers then nose dives vertically into the ground at very high speed is a normal crash (the massive roller-coaster in the sky type profile). It is very similar to what happened with the Max and even if the hardware and software are different it's essentially still the same plane type a Boeing 737 type. I have studied what happened with the 737 Max closely and Boeing was deeply in neglect, I wouldn't be surprised if there was a fault with an aircraft that is very similar, in fact the model before. Boeing has been on a downhill slide for a while. Just because Boeing made wonderful planes in the past doesn't mean that as time goes on and newer people take over the initial teams are watered down and subsequent efforts produce crap. Especially with questionable management concerned more with profit than quality and excellence. I have seen this very thing happen in my work experience. |
zqwerty (97) | ||
| 1485074 | 2022-03-22 08:06:00 | Its either been shot down, bomb onboard midair or a kamikaze pilot IMO. From the footage it would put a Ju87 to shame. | prefect (6291) | ||
| 1485075 | 2022-03-22 08:18:00 | So according to you a plane which has never had a very high crash record (almost perfect in fact) is flying along at 29,000 feet and suddenly goes into a steep dive, pulls up at around 8000 feet briefly recovers then nose dives vertically into the ground at very high speed is a normal crash (the massive roller-coaster in the sky type profile). It is very similar to what happened with the Max and even if the hardware and software are different it's essentially still the same plane type a Boeing 737 type. from the bit that i've seen there was no recovery or roller-coaster type profile. it simply went into a steep dive until impact. i think what people are looking at is the ground speed data which shows roller-coater profile because when the plane goes near vertical in travel, ground speed goes way down (because the plane is not travel far across the ground). did boeing cause it? we will not know until they find out the cause. to suggest boeing caused it is complete speculation BS. |
tweak'e (69) | ||
| 1485076 | 2022-03-22 10:20:00 | No in the news tonight they showed the plane diving from 29,000 feet, recovering at about 8,000 feet, flying level then diving vertically into the ground. See here: "Without access to data stored onboard the plane’s so-called black box recorders, investigators can’t determine exactly how or why the jet crashed. But preliminary data from flight tracker website Flightradar24 indicates that, at about 100 miles from its destination and just as the Boeing 737 should have begun a controlled descent, the aircraft lurched into a nosedive, plummetting from its cruising altitude of 29,100 feet to 3,225 feet, its last known signal, in just over a minute and a half. Flightradar24 data suggests flight MU5735 hurtled towards earth at a rate of over 30,000 feet per minute. In a still-unexplained twist, Flightradar24’s data shows that, after falling for over 40 seconds, the plane halted its nose-dive and began to climb again, regaining 1,000 feet in roughly 10 seconds, before plunging once more." From here: fortune.com |
zqwerty (97) | ||
| 1485077 | 2022-03-22 17:44:00 | That's what some said about Airbus to start with, inc pilots. All planes can crash....but statistically you are safer in a plane than your car. Most crashes are pilot error or a combination of things, not one thing. Watch Aircrash Investigation.... Speculation doesn't help, wait and see what the report says........that's common on AI docos too, people making all sorts of claims and it turns out to be something else entirely. As for the planes themselves, how many AIRNZ Boeings have crashed? |
piroska (17583) | ||
| 1485078 | 2022-03-22 20:59:00 | Latest news is observers said the plane appeared undamaged whilst vertical diving into the ground. Black boxes still to be found, strangely no bodies, but a fair amount of clothes and usual debris around the site. Presumably most of the heavy solid bits ie engines will be buried underground since it was a vertical dive and not a landing whilst not powered. Also strange the fact that debris was spread over a large area is hard to understand as the plane was coming in to land and probably had not much fuel onboard, and it was a vertical crash so why the large area of spread? Maybe they were pulling out of the dive in the last few seconds? Doesn't seem likely from that video however. |
zqwerty (97) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 | |||||