| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 59762 | 2005-07-12 03:09:00 | Survey - State Housing | Fergie (6508) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 371481 | 2005-07-12 22:37:00 | Hi Fergie. A difficult task you have chosen. There are many kiwis who have never actually experienced a state housing project and many who have experienced nothing else. Lots of biases out there. Some project areas have gone through the "state housing" era and the sturdy houses are looking good and selling privately for a good price. Others are so bad that the premises are being demolished. I don't know how much background you have, but consider Googling on "State Housing site:NZ". Good luck. | Scouse (83) | ||
| 371482 | 2005-07-12 23:18:00 | thanks for the feedback guys. What i have to do is compare 'groups' opinions on SH and anaylse this. So i might have a "low income group" a "rental property owner" group, high income etc. Then - depending on the results of course, i can say stuff like: The Rental property owners find SH to be a nuisance as its hard for them to compete with the low cost of SH. ANd high income owners may say that its unfair that they should pay for peoples accomodation (thro tax) etc etc |
Fergie (6508) | ||
| 371483 | 2005-07-13 03:41:00 | ... Some project areas have gone through the "state housing" era and the sturdy houses are looking good and selling privately for a good price. Others are so bad that the premises are being demolished. ... And this situation doesn't apply in the "free market" housing industry? |
Graham L (2) | ||
| 371484 | 2005-07-13 04:41:00 | ANd high income owners may say that its unfair that they should pay for peoples accomodation (thro tax) etc etc May I just point out that it is middle income and single taxpayers who are actually doing the paying. |
Winston001 (3612) | ||
| 1 2 3 | |||||