Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 59823 2005-07-13 22:54:00 Speaking of Capill.... Metla (12) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
371922 2005-07-14 07:56:00 From the look of him in the court room, maybe he will commit suicide...

His comments about consent came after his court theatrics.
Murray P (44)
371923 2005-07-14 09:09:00 From the look of him in the court room, maybe he will commit suicide...


Nah No such luck. As Greg Newbold said "he's a bit of a sissy."
Also topping himself is probably against his religion!!!
Shame. It would save us all having to pay for his keep for the next however many years.
olwyn (8088)
371924 2005-07-14 09:30:00 Nah No such luck. As Greg Newbold said "he's a bit of a sissy."
Also topping himself is probably against his religion!!!
Shame. It would save us all having to pay for his keep for the next however many years.

Alot of the things he has done i would say would be against his religion, i recon one of guards should "accidently" let him into the general population.
jackrulz (2216)
371925 2005-07-14 10:43:00 He did mention what the law classes as rape is different to what the bible does, me I'm not a religous man but if I were I would commit a crime just to be put in a cell next to him, to politely tell him he is wrong. It must get it all the church going people right in a twist, with him tarring you all with the same brush plod (107)
371926 2005-07-14 11:01:00 well if he gets "accidentally" killed I would not miss him bob_doe_nz (92)
371927 2005-07-14 11:01:00 Hypocrical dipstick. Capill, I mean. And so the guy who assaulted him had a record? Well so what he did his time. And got (proportionily) a lot more IMHO.

Saying a 5 year old asked for it? Total dipstickism.

Christianity and child rape.

Islam and terrorism.

I'm a non-reilgious person and frankly look forward to the the end of this tripe on the planet.

We have no ultimate choice but to sort it out amongst ourselves without appeals to and justifictions from these 'higher' and fantasy authorities.

HTH................m:)
mark c (247)
371928 2005-07-14 11:04:00 deleted as fear of being banned plod (107)
371929 2005-07-14 23:05:00 He gets a nine year sentence, no minimum non-praole period. Earliest possible parole is in three years. One lousy year for each victim. Three years to polish his speach, to get his lines down pat.

Bah! the judge gives him a tongue lashing, then partially retracts it by giving him a, relative, slap on the rist with a wet bus ticket. Faultless sinners rejoice :annoyed:
Murray P (44)
371930 2005-07-14 23:07:00 He gets a nine year sentence, no minimum non-praole period. Earliest possible parole is in three years. One lousy year for each victim. Three years to polish his speach, to get his lines down pat.

Bah! the judge gives him a tongue lashing, then partially retracts it by giving him a, relative, slap on the rist with a wet bus ticket. Faultless sinners rejoice :annoyed:
he mayge eligble for parole in 3 years, but under the new law he can also be made to serve the whole sentence instead of two thirds of it..
plod (107)
371931 2005-07-14 23:11:00 deleted as fear of being banned



***, Bans are only short, 3 minutes for first offence .

Be a man and post your thoughts .
Metla (12)
1 2 3