| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 65369 | 2006-01-15 22:40:00 | Reason #764362 not to buy Symantec | Metla (12) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 421482 | 2006-01-17 03:17:00 | NOD32 modifies the Winsock layer of Windows to insert it's POP3 proxy. In the event Nod screws out it will stop your machine getting any traffic in or out. Period. The fix isn't exactly obvious, or easy either. Nod32 sucks as hard as Symantec does. Enjoying the $hitfight lads, take a break while I ask Ninja a question... ok an observation: Ninj, you say NOD sucks as hard as Symantic. My experience tells me that NOD32 is way better on so many different levels that it's no contest, and yet, your experience tells you something different. Should you have narrowed your statement down a tad to save all the poor, non-enterprise, souls who now think, after they've just cleaned Symantic crap of themselves, that they've stepped straight into some poo? As you were :thumbs: |
Murray P (44) | ||
| 421483 | 2006-01-17 03:24:00 | Results 1 - 100 of about 591,000 for lightning storm linux. (0.38 seconds) www.google.co.nz Results 1 - 100 of about 2,510,000 for lightning storm windows. (0.44 seconds) www.google.co.nz staff.uow.edu.au Do the math your-self. What the stats tell me Rob, is that a much higher percentage of Windows users creep around the net than other OS users combined, so, more Windows users view and download porn? |
Murray P (44) | ||
| 421484 | 2006-01-17 04:04:00 | more Windows users view and download porn? That would probably be true, but I'd wager that a higer percentage of linux users download porn than users of any other OS. |
Greven (91) | ||
| 421485 | 2006-01-17 05:19:00 | Somebody pass me the popcorn. I'm all out :waughh:My thoughts exactly lol | Myth (110) | ||
| 421486 | 2006-01-17 05:44:00 | What the stats tell me Rob, is that a much higher percentage of Windows users creep around the net than other OS users combined, so, more Windows users view and download porn? The very reason I brought a mac, so I could porn to my hearts content without worries :cool: |
plod (107) | ||
| 421487 | 2006-01-17 07:57:00 | Common sense has never failed me in virus-avoiding, but AVG has never failed my friends - I would recommend using that when common sense wasn't available in sufficient supply. | george12 (7) | ||
| 421488 | 2006-01-17 08:08:00 | Somebody pass me the popcorn. I'm all out :waughh: Im not sharing but I have some marshmellows if you want to toast them :D |
beama (111) | ||
| 421489 | 2006-01-17 08:19:00 | That would probably be true, but I'd wager that a higer percentage of linux users download porn than users of any other OS . The stats say different % wise, which was my point . You'll have to find your own inane comments and nurture them yourself Greven, totally unconscious inanity being a very personal thing, you see . ;) |
Murray P (44) | ||
| 421490 | 2006-01-17 08:29:00 | I wonder howfar this goes before Miss Banny Pants does something... :lol: Lord knows what Chilly Willy and Rhubarb Man are doing ;) :rolleyes: |
bob_doe_nz (92) | ||
| 421491 | 2006-01-17 08:31:00 | That would probably be true, but I'd wager that a higer percentage of linux users download porn than users of any other OS. :rolleyes: I'd wager against that. Think about it a second. The large majority of computers on the internet are mass produced, mass marketed, windows boxen. These are generally sold to your average family - with the average teenagers, and the average parents. I'd imagine these are more likely to be the downloaders of porn (and summarily spyware, dialers etc) than Linux users. |
ninja (1671) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | |||||