| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 65330 | 2006-01-14 21:18:00 | Anyone here understand Italian? | Greg (193) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 421041 | 2006-01-15 04:48:00 | Q: What do you call an Italian with an IQ of 170? A: Sicily. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 421042 | 2006-01-15 06:22:00 | I manage another online forum I know which one that message was posted on :D :p ;) hehe |
stu161204 (123) | ||
| 421043 | 2006-01-15 07:22:00 | Hmm, being part Italian I pride myself on knowing some italian (mainly foods and cars :D) Am really falling behind in some areas, haven't 'known' any italian women :( |
Myth (110) | ||
| 421044 | 2006-01-15 07:32:00 | Some say this is more like Italian For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replased either by "k" or "s"and likewise "x"would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c"would be retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w"spelling, so that "which"and "one"would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y"replasing it with "i"and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali wonse and for all. Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c","y"and "x"-- bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez -- tu riplais "ch","sh"and "th"rispektivli. Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld. |
Eric (378) | ||
| 421045 | 2006-01-15 09:07:00 | Hmm, being part Italian I pride myself on knowing some italian (mainly foods and cars :D) Am really falling behind in some areas, haven't 'known' any italian women :(You haven't known life until you've "known" an Italian woman. And I will certainly know death if my missus reads this post! :xmouth: |
Greg (193) | ||
| 421046 | 2006-01-15 09:11:00 | Some say this is more like Italian For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replased either by "k" or "s"and likewise "x"would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c"would be retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w"spelling, so that "which"and "one"would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y"replasing it with "i"and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali wonse and for all. Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c","y"and "x"-- bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez -- tu riplais "ch","sh"and "th"rispektivli. Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld. Eric old mate... sometimes you don't say some really nonsensical things. And sometimes you do. |
Greg (193) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||