| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 91487 | 2008-07-09 01:58:00 | Is there anything better than DVD Shrink? | mark1978 (13845) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 686672 | 2008-07-09 03:15:00 | No compression = no encoding, it's just a direct copy. The encoding load comes when you're trying to shrink it, and it has to re-encode the entire video stream. Yes 4 minutes difference no compression/shrunk. I can see why it takes mark's so long with a P4, 1.5 Ram and an 80Gb IDE drive, I am surprised it does not take longer. mark1978 What P4 is it? 3.2 or less? |
Bantu (52) | ||
| 686673 | 2008-07-09 03:19:00 | It is a Pentium 4 with 2.4 ghz, why do you think it takes so long? | mark1978 (13845) | ||
| 686674 | 2008-07-09 03:27:00 | Shrink has the choice to do "Deep Analysis" before re-encoding which takes much longer. The amount of movement in a scene affects how much compression that you can get away with without obvious effects. Shrink tries to vary the bit rate to the scene being compressed. | PaulD (232) | ||
| 686675 | 2008-07-09 04:34:00 | It is a Pentium 4 with 2.4 ghz, why do you think it takes so long? That CPU isn't exactly fast - an hour to re-encode an entire DVD in MPEG2 isn't bad. |
Erayd (23) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||