Forum Home
PC World Chat
Thread ID: 66082	2006-02-10 06:46:00	WFTWE #193....Sottise....Three prime candidates for this one....	Billy T (70)	PC World Chat

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
429009	2006-02-10 06:46:00	Sottise Stupid or blundering act . :groan: Cheers Billy 8-{) :p	Billy T (70)
429010	2006-02-10 06:51:00	The Jury that acquitted the heart surgeon, Our justice system is a pathetic joke. A law for the rich. A law for the poor. And I'm just a workin man,always been a workin man.	Metla (12)
429011	2006-02-10 06:53:00	Oooooooooh so WFTWE could be catergorised as this too then????? :p no offence intended, but some of these words must surely be stuuuuupid eh? i dont think i have had to use any of these words you persist in posting yet.... I have age on my side so as long as i store em, i may one day use em dont ya think??? :lol: :illogical beetle	beetle (243)
429012	2006-02-10 07:26:00	no offence intended, but some of these words must surely be stuuuuupid eh?beetle C'mon beetle, lighten up . These ain't usin words, they're not even knowin' words! They are "good god, is that really a word?" offerings for amusement, edification, or yawning at, whichever takes your fancy at the time of reading . Cheers Billy 8-{) :D	Billy T (70)
429013	2006-02-10 07:35:00	The director should have waited till he came back to NZ, and the cops would only laugh.	gibler (49)
429014	2006-02-10 23:49:00	How can a heart surgean who made 1/4 million bucks out of dealing with stuff you can make P out get off? Beats me . So if the sum is made out of what, 'illegal activity' then surely it should be given up, favourite charity, something like that . Is it taxable income? Was it declared? Some kid from Otara sells three packets and says he thinks it's going to the islands for headache relief gets off too? Not likely . Judge was defending one of his own, that's all, old as the hills . Nothing to do with with sotisism tho, biggest blunder was probably the cops who sat on the info about his big purchases for 9 months . As for Tamahori, who cares? Guy wants to wear woman's clothing is his business . What a bunch of Mrs Grundies giving him a hard time . Women had hard enough job wearing pants to the workplace, can't see why a guy can't wear a skirt . And yeah fishnets, none of my business . Not my scene but neither's horse-racing and I don't try to ridicule that .	mark c (247)
429015	2006-02-11 01:34:00	So if the sum is made out of what, 'illegal activity' then surely it should be given up, favourite charity, something like that . Is it taxable income? Was it declared? Just musing, but if found not guilty, the activity cannot have been illegal, therefore on what basis should he be deprived of the cash? Some kid from Otara sells three packets and says he thinks it's going to the islands for headache relief gets off too? Not likely . Most likely the kid would not have committed a crime, unless it was part of an organised scheme for bulk buying of precursor drugs clearly headed for the P factories . Judge was defending his own Excuse me? It was a jury of his peers who found him not guilty . I don't recall reading of any instruction from the Judge telling the Jury that he should be found NG . I'm not defending him by the way, he appears to have been incredibly stupid, incredibly naive, or both . However, it is not a crime to assist in the export of street-legal drugs (assuming that the drugs actually did leave the country) so maybe the Jury gave him the benefit of the doubt . On the positive side, with his apparent work rate, if he gets back to surgery many good citizens will benefit from his skills so that is one positive outcome . Cheers Billy 8-{)	Billy T (70)
429016	2006-02-11 05:23:00	I think the judge influenced the jury by stating very clearly that whole case depended on whether or not the guy knew they were going to an illegal use. Now how naive do you have to be to be able to make 1/4 mill out of headache pills and think it's totally legit? Wouldn't he have talked to anyone about the nice little earner 'that was helping people back in China?" And wouldn't any of those people have said 'well sounds a bit like the "too good to be true" category to me"? Beats me you can make that sort of money and all it's totally legit?	mark c (247)
429017	2006-02-11 06:05:00	Just musing, but if found not guilty, the activity cannot have been illegal, therefore on what basis should he be deprived of the cash? With respect Billy, and I realise you're musing but, what utter BS . It requires no more analysis nor further discussion than that .	Murray P (44)
429018	2006-02-11 06:12:00	So this comes to mind, a illegally parked car where he got off the fine???? doesnt matter where it was parked, it was not legal so ????? you got fined. eh? One rule for them and one rule for us..... :rolleyes: beetle	beetle (243)
1 2