| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 67829 | 2006-04-07 05:09:00 | Juggling | Cicero (40) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 444661 | 2006-04-07 05:09:00 | If you wish to see some great juggling go here........ video.google.com |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 444662 | 2006-04-08 11:31:00 | Must I assume I am the only one who thinks this is brilliant? | Cicero (40) | ||
| 444663 | 2006-04-08 11:48:00 | Must I assume I am the only one who thinks this is brilliant? Best I've seen outside of North Carolina !! :lol: Seriously though, will have another look once the 3.5Mg download speed kicks in for me. The buffering I experienced meant that the action was slowed down considerably. Looks very impressive from what I saw. :2cents: Misty |
Misty (368) | ||
| 444664 | 2006-04-08 11:51:00 | Very good but old hat. Have had it for about a week. Trevor :) |
Trev (427) | ||
| 444665 | 2006-04-08 12:15:00 | Definitely for broadband only. Your plaintive post made me give it another try. Took 9 minutes to buffer on Dialup & then 15 minutes to play less than half the track (which is less than 5 minutes long). Afraid I pulled the plug at that point. Juggling loses a lot of its charm in slow motion.. |
Laura (43) | ||
| 444666 | 2006-04-08 12:17:00 | Very good but old hat. Have had it for about a week. Trevor :) I think it would take more than a week to call it old hat! Would this work with dial up? I have seen lots of good juggling,but I think he has come up with something original,doing it in time to the music. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 444667 | 2006-04-08 12:20:00 | Definitely for broadband only. Your plaintive post made me give it another try. Took 9 minutes to buffer on Dial up & then 15 minutes to play less than half the track (which is less than 5 minutes long). Afraid I pulled the plug at that point. Juggling loses a lot of its charm in slow motion.. Sorry you missed it L,it is so good I wanted to share,hence your apt description. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1 | |||||