| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 67955 | 2006-04-11 14:00:00 | Building a site that validates with W3C | stu161204 (123) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 445766 | 2006-04-13 02:01:00 | Is this it ................ ------------------------------------------------------ Link removed at Stu's request to maintian his right to privacy. |
Rob99 (151) | ||
| 445767 | 2006-04-13 04:29:00 | There's one good reason for following a standard if one exists: it's right. There's a very good reason for not "improving" or "enhancing" a standard: it's wrong, and it breaks. Doing things you can "get away with" because the interpreters (and browsers) accept non standard-compliant code is laziness and sloppy work. Another term for that is "non-professional". |
Graham L (2) | ||
| 445768 | 2006-04-13 04:33:00 | I think Graham puts it quite nicely. | mejobloggs (264) | ||
| 445769 | 2006-04-13 06:23:00 | Is this it ................ ------------------------------------------------------ Link removed at Stu's request to maintian his right to privacy. Woops - sorry NHD. |
Rob99 (151) | ||
| 445770 | 2006-04-13 06:31:00 | But if that was the site, it would be easy to validate and convert tables to div and css. Have a look here www.ssi-developer.net | Rob99 (151) | ||
| 445771 | 2006-04-13 06:43:00 | Woops - sorry NHD. No worry Rob :), Just that page had my full name & pic on it ;) (I try & keep my Full name & pic off forums ;)) |
stu161204 (123) | ||
| 445772 | 2006-04-27 23:25:00 | What happened with this stu? I am interested in hearing how you went. | mejobloggs (264) | ||
| 445773 | 2006-04-28 01:22:00 | What happened with this stu? I am interested in hearing how you went. I will update this thread once I get around to validating the site :) ;) |
stu161204 (123) | ||
| 445774 | 2006-05-11 23:30:00 | Here is an article that does some explaining on why not to use tables for layout. www.hotdesign.com |
mejobloggs (264) | ||
| 445775 | 2006-05-12 02:06:00 | Here is an article that does some explaining on why not to use tables for layout. www.hotdesign.com be bothered to look beyond the first silly page. Here's an "article" that explains why I use tables: 1) They work. 2) They work for my clients. 3) No other way has been proven to me to work better. 4) I'm not prejudiced against tables. 5) For now I'm too lazy to learn an alternative method to tables. 6) I couldn't care less about validation or other criteria. 7) I'm happy. |
Greg (193) | ||
| 1 2 3 | |||||