| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 92878 | 2008-08-26 19:52:00 | Slow Broadband | prayami (13094) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 700572 | 2008-08-27 08:18:00 | Personally, that would not be too bad if the pings didn't suck! What is with NZ and 350 ping to the US?! Does a high speed improve pings by a lot? (eg 150 ping to US would be quite nice.) |
SPARTAN 860 (2618) | ||
| 700573 | 2008-08-27 08:55:00 | www.speedtest.net"><img src="http: Just tried pinging the states. |
the_bogan (9949) | ||
| 700574 | 2008-08-27 09:16:00 | Canada was better. www.speedtest.net |
the_bogan (9949) | ||
| 700575 | 2008-08-27 12:02:00 | Hi, My friend got the broadband from slingshot with plan 256KBPS download and 128KBPS upload speed............ Please suggest, what can be done to improve the speed. Thanks, Obviously, all speed figures quoted are kbs NOT KBs an average transfer speed of 206 kbs would be not unreasonable on a 256 plan with a long extension as stated. After all, a 256 plan is barely 5 times dial up, not really a "broadband" connection by any stretch of the imagination. I dont even know how they still get away with calling it as such. Most ISP's dont even offer it as a "cheap" option these days |
bevy121 (117) | ||
| 700576 | 2008-08-28 06:40:00 | Canada was better. www.speedtest.net Ummm with pings, LOWER is better. I get around 261 ping to LA too. But some others are 350 :( |
SPARTAN 860 (2618) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||