Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 71183 2006-07-28 18:26:00 AOL a'Go-Go SurferJoe46 (51) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
474437 2006-07-28 18:26:00 AOL's parent company, Time Warner, won't announce its second-quarter earnings until next week . But the first quarter was pretty lame . Unlike its fellow horsemen (E-Bay, Yahoo, Amazon *footnote), AOL saw revenues fall by about 7 percent, as 3 . 1 million Americans stopped subscribing . I know I did . . . last year because of the English-as-a-third-language techs and helpline assistants .

Like its fellow horsemen, AOL saw operating income fall—by about 14 percent, from $314 million to $269 million . On July 11, the Wall Street Journal reported that AOL might soon adopt a new business strategy: It will morph from a subscription-powered Internet-access provider to an advertising-supported portal .

The subscription business is declining anyway . Make that: "dead on arrival" .

So, (as the prospective plan goes), AOL should stop charging subscription fees to AOL users who have high-speed Internet access from cable or telephone companies . . . . . . thus forgoing up to $1 billion in operating profit through 2009 .

If it can keep people using AOL for e-mail (and hence as a launching pad for the Internet), it might be able to capture more of the Internet-ad-sales market, which is growing at a rate of 25 percent a year .

Is this an AOL 1990s flashback? . . . . . . . . It's plan rests on the assumption that recent trends in ad-spending growth will continue unabated for several years into the future! Yeah . . . . . . . sure!

Crystal ball gazing has NOT been a strong point in AOL/Time Warner's optical capacities in the past . . . what makes them think they'll get it right this time?

With their shift to off-shore tech and that 2-second delay on a toll-free line, they tried . . . oh! they were very trying!

Footnote: From the ashes of the 2001-2002 crash there emerged four horsemen of the dot-com apocalypse: Amazon . com, Yahoo!, eBay, and AOL . This quartet of iconic companies, wounded but not destroyed in the crash, survived the plague years and flourished when the market recovered . But in recent weeks, at a time when online advertising and e-commerce are enjoying strong growth, all four have pulled up lame . The group that once led the Nasdaq's resurgence has generally lagged the tech-heavy index over the past year .

You can't blame it all on Google . Each of the horsemen is still a leader in its core business, Google or no Google . But each derives the lion's share of its revenues from a maturing U . S . market, each is finding profit margins slipping as it tries to diversify, and each has foolishly reached back to tried-and-failed ideas of the dot-com era for salvation .
SurferJoe46 (51)
474438 2006-07-30 12:12:00 cyber.geti.or.kr Rob99 (151)
474439 2006-07-30 12:26:00 Too subtle for me, Rob.

What was I supposed to get from that link?
Laura (43)
474440 2006-07-30 12:43:00 I couldnt find any tumbleweed sounds.
I think it would be cool if we could have sounds when you click into a thread, this one is very quiet. For monday laughs web.ukonline.co.uk
Rob99 (151)
474441 2006-07-30 12:52:00 Ah well, the sound of a tumbleweed isn't exactly what I thought of (but we won't go there...) not being all that common around these parts.

I guess it might mean something to SurferJoe?

I'll leave you to your play...
Laura (43)
474442 2006-07-30 16:24:00 I could take it one of several ways:


1) a very dry post, no machine guns, screeching tires or screams by victims

2) that I should dry up and blow away

3) that whatever humor in the article left the reader dry of emotion

4) that the www is a desert and a dead man's zone .

5) that my well of quick-witted and barbed humor has dried up .

6) that all (AOL, E-Bay, Yahoo, Amazon) should dry up and blow away

7) a complaint that there was no gratuitus nudity in the post


The post was meant to be mulled over, like fine wine and dark bread; not chewed and swallowed, losing the subtle nuances(*) of prose-worthy juxtapositioning(#) and esotericism(%); as opposed to exoteric(+) .


* A subtle difference in meaning or opinion or attitude; "without understanding the finer nuances you can't enjoy the humor"; "don't argue about shades of meaning"

# The arrangement of two or more ideas, characters, actions, settings, phrases, or words side-by-side or in similar narrative moments for the purpose of comparison, contrast, rhetorical effect, suspense, or character development . See also antithesis, bathos, foil, mirror passage, and mirror scene .

% Hidden or deeper knowledge or teachings that are possessed or understood only by a few .

+ Knowledge that is publicly available, in contrast with esoteric knowledge, which is kept from everyone except the initiated .
SurferJoe46 (51)
474443 2006-07-30 16:55:00 Well I mulled over it like fine wine, Joe -
if it makes you feel any better?
Laura (43)
474444 2006-07-30 17:18:00 Yeah.....I'm good now. SurferJoe46 (51)
474445 2006-07-30 23:18:00 7 :lol: Rob99 (151)
1