Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 96126 2008-12-30 00:54:00 MS Word Form Fields Design Question Perry (4966) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
733563 2008-12-30 00:54:00 Drop-down Form Fields

In nearly all cases with such fields, there
is one option that will exclude the others .
E . g .

Mr/Mrs/MS/Miss/Bi/Prefer not to answer (whatever!)

But is there a way to 'manage' a multiple
options question that allows several of the
options to be selected?

The sort of thing that you'd expect to the
standard "mark all that apply" question .
E . g

Indicate all the symptoms displayed by
the patient . . . with a list of (say) 10
options available . How to select several
from the list - that's the question?

If I put the same drop-down field in ten
times (to allow for every option), I will
likely end up with a form with at least
50% of the fields uncompleted, which
will take up space . One objective is to
reduce wasted space!

The proficiency level of the intended form
users is not high, so I do need to KISS!

Any brainwaves? :thanks

Perry
Perry (4966)
733564 2008-12-30 10:27:00 Wouldn't that be confusing for the person ??


Indicate all the symptoms displayed by
the patient . . . with a list of (say) 10
options available . How to select several
from the list - that's the question?


Whats the chance of a person having, say selecting one option, and it automatically selects other symptoms ??

Couldn't you use check boxes ??

Anyway - what version of word are you using . ?
wainuitech (129)
733565 2008-12-30 11:18:00 Couldn't you use check boxes ??That's my fall-back position, of course. I was
wondering if there was a more elegant solution?
Using the very same example, if a patient needs
only one box checked, I'll have nine redundant
questions/check boxes.

I forgot to mention that the completed form is
required to be printed on paper, hence the goal
to squeeze out as many superfluous items as
I can. (The current printed result is 12 pages
& I'm trying to slow down the forest-felling rate!

I've created the form in W2003 and I think the
organisation is using the same version.
Perry (4966)
733566 2008-12-30 20:43:00 Primary symptom selection (dropdown) would list secondary indicators ie wainuitech suggestion maybe all ticked by default giving the user the ability to unselect then confirm with the ability to go back and change

If these ppl are a bit technology challenged I would be running a parallel prototype to their exsisting system just to see how things go and any mods that need to done.
beama (111)
733567 2008-12-31 04:49:00 Primary symptom selection (dropdown) would list secondary indicators ie wainuitech suggestion maybe all ticked by default giving the user the ability to unselect then confirm with the ability to go back and change.
Whether selecting or de-selecting, I don't see how
that solves the problem of potentially having many
redundant check boxes (with associated space and
paper wastage).


If these ppl are a bit technology challenged I would be running a parallel prototype to their existing system just to see how things go and any mods that need to done.
The present system is paper, so remains a fall-
back option. Indeed, one staff has trialled the
PC-based option for 2 months. Plan is for one
more staff member to start trialling the same
thing, in the new year. So it's a very slow and
steady testing phase before wider adoption.

The primary question to this thread is not as
a response to feedback, but my critique of my
own work, in an attempt to make it better.
(There have been other suggestions from the
one staff member presently using the PC form,
but I've been able to deal with them, myself.)

The problem child identified in this thread has
me beat, so far, though.
Perry (4966)
733568 2008-12-31 05:14:00 Two ways I can see of doing it -


If you have drop down boxes for each question - with a possible selection of answers, then when the answer is selected thats the one that shows, and when its printed off you will only show the actual answer, not the full list - as shown HERE (www.imagef1.net.nz)on the MS partner program I went to today to do some updates in my details.
use excel - and use a formula something along the lines of If Question 1= Yes - Question 2 = yes / no etc -- then the other boxes will automatically be ticked as well - but I don't know excel well enough to give a formula (s) - some one else should be able to help if thats an option.


I would say if you used excel the formula's could be quite complicated.
wainuitech (129)
733569 2008-12-31 08:11:00 any good at vbs I feel a custom macro coming on theres a near guru here with this sort of thing and surprisingly enough his nick is very close to your "Parry" (www.pressf1.co.nz) hopefully he will see this thread beama (111)
733570 2008-12-31 08:14:00 Two ways I can see of doing it -


If you have drop down boxes for each question - with a possible selection of answers, then when the answer is selected thats the one that shows, and when its printed off you will only show the actual answer, not the full list - as shown HERE (www.imagef1.net.nz)on the MS partner program I went to today to do some updates in my details.
use excel - and use a formula something along the lines of If Question 1= Yes - Question 2 = yes / no etc -- then the other boxes will automatically be ticked as well - but I don't know excel well enough to give a formula (s) - some one else should be able to help if thats an option.

I would say if you used excel the formula's could be quite complicated.
hate to write those "if" statements:eek::eek::eek: maybe a case statement would be better
beama (111)
733571 2008-12-31 08:41:00 I used to do a bit of mailmerge programming - years
ago - some quite complicated. By years ago, I mean
an 8bit processor running @ 4Hz! Life seemed so
much less complicated, way back then, before the
great gawd GUI messed up the calm waters.

On the basis of your informed comments, it does seem
as if it's going to be simpler to leave well alone. The
(self-driven) counsel of perfection is all well and good,
but not to be pursued to the exclusion of all else.

I think I've squeezed 12 pages down to between 5 & 7,
(depends on the length of text field answers), so I'll
learn to live with a couple of more-than-one multi-
choice bits as check box responses, even if part of
me wants to better that option.

VB (apps) scared me witless when I last looked at it,
in an attempt to create a mail merge output from
a database. So I gave that idea up, too, and stuck
with a vintage PC running the original 'old 8bit stuff,'
which I'd ported across to 16bit.

:thanksfor taking time out to give me the benefit of
your insights. I do appreciate it.

Happy New Year - if it's an available option ;)
Perry (4966)
733572 2009-01-15 01:13:00 OK - the December break is over . . . .

Back to that damned form . And yet another
snag: page breaks .

I've got the 12 page (hand-completed) form
down to a word-processor form of five pages .
However, that's an empty template and could
well be 7-8 pages, when a document is created
and filled from it . (Still a saving on trees!)

The form is randomly strewn with 1, 2 & 3
columns, as it wanders from combo box, to
check box to text . And I see a problem with
the section breaks .

The Paragraph > Line and pages breaks >
keep lines together doesn't seem to work
across section breaks . As a consequence,
the template has some sections broken
across a page end .

I have no way of knowing how the completed
form will fill the pages, so a manually inserted
[page break] in the form just isn't appropriate .

I will protect the document, which will stop
accidental changes, but it will also stop the
option to insert page breaks, when needed
to ensure sections aren't broken across two
pages . (Can't see that as an allowable option
under Protect document > Editing restrictions
either . :angry

Anyone got any clues about this one?
Perry (4966)
1 2