Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 143775 2017-04-06 19:17:00 How to stop the gas attacks and fighting is Syria Digby (677) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
1433856 2017-04-06 19:17:00 The rebels fighting Assad in Syria could stop the gas attacks tomorrow by giving in and stop fighting.

They started an uprising that failed - they lost - they should give up

All they have achieved is the destruction of their country and the slaughter of their children who they keep breeding whilst under attack.

Many middle class Syrians still support Assad as he bought stability and relative prosperity.

Look at the hell hole of Iraq and Libya to see what happens when you take away an arab strongman in a country that never existed before.
Digby (677)
1433857 2017-04-06 20:10:00 Or the United Nations could get up off it's fat arse and impose sanctions or send in a peace keeping force to sort these mongrels out! Zippity (58)
1433858 2017-04-06 20:12:00 Or the United Nations could get up off it's fat arse and impose sanctions or send in a peace keeping force to sort these mongrels out!

That will never happen while Russian and China are on the security council.
Digby (677)
1433859 2017-04-06 20:21:00 There is only one way to stop those idiots in the Middle East from killing each other, unfortunately it is completely unacceptable. CliveM (6007)
1433860 2017-04-07 00:25:00 As long as Russia is actively involved, what country will be willing to go head to head against Russian Military down there.
Get involved and you'll eventually have to go up against the Russians and start shooting down their bombers .
1101 (13337)
1433861 2017-04-07 02:47:00 As long as Russia is actively involved, what country will be willing to go head to head against Russian Military down there.
Get involved and you'll eventually have to go up against the Russians and start shooting down their bombers .

What Country?
U.S.A.
www.stuff.co.nz
KarameaDave (15222)
1433862 2017-04-07 03:01:00 Slightly off topic, I think that the "chemical attacks" were probably planted by ISIS, the UN said they have access to cannisters of this stuff a few years ago. Digby (677)
1433863 2017-04-08 02:11:00 Did anyone else think 59 missiles at $1million each, to kill 4 people was a bit embarrassing??

Better aim throwing rocks perhaps? And cheaper.
pctek (84)
1433864 2017-04-08 03:42:00 Did anyone else think 59 missiles at $1million each, to kill 4 people was a bit embarrassing??

Better aim throwing rocks perhaps? And cheaper.

No. The purpose was to destroy the airfield and facilities, killing people was incidental.
Terry Porritt (14)
1433865 2017-04-08 05:16:00 It will also put America back to work making 60 new missiles to replace those ones! Digby (677)
1 2