Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 79436 2007-05-20 04:03:00 starcraft2 motorbyclist (188) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
551314 2007-05-20 04:03:00 www.blizzard.com

kinda reminds me of duke nukem forever - "when it's done"
motorbyclist (188)
551315 2007-05-20 04:33:00 www.blizzard.com

kinda reminds me of duke nukem forever - "when it's done"

You are thinking of Starcraft: Ghost which was canned. SCII was never in the talks until recently. But SC was one of my most favourite games. Got it in 1999 and can still have a skirmish every now and again :D
trinsic (6945)
551316 2007-05-20 05:08:00 You are thinking of Starcraft: Ghost which was canned. SCII was never in the talks until recently. But SC was one of my most favourite games. Got it in 1999 and can still have a skirmish every now and again :D

did you click the link? what i meant was the phrase they have used there reminds me of a quote from a 3d realms trailer for duke forever.

i too have the occasional starcraft match at lan parties:thumbs:

i think they should have finished ghost though, or maybe make a starcraft fps, call of duty style, playing through a section of the war as a marine/zealot. it's need some pretty good graphics and would have to do justice to zerg rushes (ie several hundred units at once).

i'm not too keen on the new styling for the rts, so the fps would definetly need to set a mood of horror... and put doom3/gears of war to shame
i'm thinking like those flashback in the official trailer (92MB for those who want it in high def, or just look on youtube)

EDIT: now that's alot of "i"s
motorbyclist (188)
551317 2007-05-20 05:35:00 It can be a great sequel if they don't tamper too much with the perfectly balanced gameplay of the original, or it could be an abomination raised from the dead that vaguely resembles the game we love (like warcraft 3 did to the warcraft series) Greven (91)
551318 2007-05-20 10:57:00 Got to gamespot.com. Blizzard says PC is the primary platform. :yuck: Consoles is for the poors. Who give a damn about consoles.(I learned that from other PC forums, consoles are yuck plus fixed resolutions too, too bad PC are way faster and looks good with 8900 or X2950XTX)
:D Nothing beats the skills of mouse + keyboard controls. Consoles? I bet limited buttons and limited movements.
PedalSlammer (8511)
551319 2007-05-20 11:43:00 the starcraft versions for consoles (such as n64) actually had bug fixes etc that pc didn't! for example suvs/probes/drones would automatically collect resources once they had been produced whereas in the pc version you had to tell them to. i agree; rts and fps games on a console without a mouse is just dumb, and you can't tweak graphics etc much nor upgrade the machine motorbyclist (188)
551320 2007-05-20 14:38:00 did you click the link? what i meant was the phrase they have used there reminds me of a quote from a 3d realms trailer for duke forever.

I checked it again since last night and it had indeed changed to the new splash. I would of understood straight away from the WWI Preview if it hadn't of been said in Korean :D
trinsic (6945)
1