Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 80467 2007-06-24 09:49:00 New Rig, Can you Guys see any issues Pacifier (2821) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
562389 2007-06-24 09:49:00 Hi all

I am putting this rig together, can you see any incompatible hardware, it'll be running Vista 64bit plus various other OS's

Case - Antec SOLO Quiet ATX Mid Tower Case, Silver/Black
Motherboard - Asus P5k deluxe/WIFI-AP Motherboard, Socket 775, 1066MHz FSB,
CPU - Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 CPU, 2.67GHz, 1066MHz FSB, Socket 775, 32/64-Bit,
Hard Drive - Samsung SP2504C Hard Disk Drive, 250GB, 7200rpm, 8192KB Cache, SATA
DVD writer LG Electronics GSA-H30NSBBK DVD Writer, DVD 16R/18W/8RW, CD 48R/48W/32RW, Internal, SATA
Memory - 2X Corsair XMS2, TWIN2X2048-5400C4, 2x1GB, DDR2-675, PC2-5400, CL4
Video Card - Asus EN8800GTS/HTDP/640M Video Card, GeForce 8800 GTS, 640MB, DDR3
Monitor - Samsung 226BW Monitor, 22" LCD, 1680x1050, DVI, Black
Power supply - Hiper Type-R Modular, 580W ATX PSU
Hard Drive -Samsung HD501LJ HDD, 500GB, 7200rpm, 16384KB Cache, SATA-2
Cooling - Case Fans 2X Vantec SF9225L, 92mm Stealth Case Fan

Thanks for your help.
Pacifier (2821)
562390 2007-06-24 10:04:00 They all look dang fine to me. Although, I suggest you upgrade your RAM to PC6400 (DDR2 800). Core 2 Duo do best with PC4200 or PC6400+ memories. qazwsxokmijn (102)
562391 2007-06-24 10:12:00 I think you could do better with the case. Cooling high spec components is important and that case doesnt look like it has very good ventilation...

Just my 2c
SolMiester (139)
562392 2007-06-24 10:13:00 I had thought about ddr2800, do you reckon the latency 4 of the 667 would be worse than the latency5 of 800, cos decent latency 800 is way too pricey Pacifier (2821)
562393 2007-06-24 10:13:00 I'll stop you there. Go with 32bit vista for a year. With the fairly powerful computer you're building, you'll be disappointed when hardly any games work with it. Even 32bit Vista is pretty bad. - you may want to consider dual-booting both XP and Vista if you can't live without some older games (and even new ones like NFS Carbon.)

64bit doesn't really equal better performance - their is some debate about this - it mainly allows more than 4gbs of RAM and some security benefits.

I'd also consider getting 2 more 250gb hard drives instead of 1 500gb, and raiding them. It's cheaper and has better performance.

If you don't know what RAID is then ask.
imarubberducky (7230)
562394 2007-06-24 10:24:00 Sorry ducky, it should read 2 X 250 drives, they will be in raid 0, the 500 is just for data, I will be runng XP as one of the other OS's. I run alot of VMs so will use Vista as the base for that, at leat I'll get to use all the memory. Pacifier (2821)
562395 2007-06-24 21:47:00 Hard Drive - Samsung SP2504C Hard Disk Drive, 250GB, 7200rpm, 8192KB Cache, SATA
DVD writer LG Electronics GSA-H30NSBBK DVD Writer, DVD 16R/18W/8RW, CD 48R/48W/32RW, Internal, SATA


Make it Seagate.

Make the DVD ASUS, Pioneer or Liteon.
pctek (84)
562396 2007-06-24 21:57:00 Doesn't running VMs slow things down a lot?

I notice a lot of latency and slow loads/running when I VMd 98SE and 2000Pro on a pretty hot Dell I use as a test bed for "things" that shall remain nameless here.
SurferJoe46 (51)
562397 2007-06-24 22:14:00 Doesn't running VMs slow things down a lot?

I notice a lot of latency and slow loads/running when I VMd 98SE and 2000Pro on a pretty hot Dell I use as a test bed for "things" that shall remain nameless here.

Yeah it does, but my coin won't stretch to a dual quad server unfortunetly, so I'll have to out up with the slow downs, although it will be markedly better than my p4 2.2 is now
Pacifier (2821)
562398 2007-06-24 22:21:00 Doesn't running VMs slow things down a lot?

I notice a lot of latency and slow loads/running when I VMd 98SE and 2000Pro on a pretty hot Dell I use as a test bed for "things" that shall remain nameless here .

I wouldn't have thought you were into downloading dodgy files SJ:eek:
winmacguy (3367)
1 2