Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 99579 2009-05-07 06:22:00 Using TV as a Monitor Bryden (4161) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
771936 2009-05-07 06:22:00 I am still contemplating changing my 19" AOC monitor for a larger screen size. One computer shop in Hamilton suggested if I was going to 26" or above I should use a TV instead.... can anyway please advise me "fors" and "againsts"....

TIA

Bryden
Bryden (4161)
771937 2009-05-07 07:04:00 If you really need that much screen real estate, you could just buy 2 of these (www.playtech.co.nz)and run it as a dual monitor setup. It's cheaper than buying a new TV :). davidmmac (4619)
771938 2009-05-07 07:11:00 If you really need that much screen real estate, you could just buy 2 of these (www.playtech.co.nz)and run it as a dual monitor setup. It's cheaper than buying a new TV :).

Downside to that is all the F'n error messages appear in the middle...
the_bogan (9949)
771939 2009-05-07 07:12:00 There are monitors larger than 26", so why they suggested a TV I have no idea. pcuser42 (130)
771940 2009-05-07 07:24:00 Well, you could take a look at this (www.playtech.co.nz) page here :thumbs:

Edit: and this (www.ascent.co.nz) page here. :)

Both have monitors larger than 26".
davidmmac (4619)
771941 2009-05-07 08:58:00 I would get a monitor, it would be much cheaper that a high resolution TV! Blam (54)
771942 2009-05-07 09:46:00 Not that much cheaper from the prices I saw.... $800+ for a 26" television, not that much less for a 26" monitor, which after all is only useful as part of a computer.... however, maybe there is a downside that I am not aware of? If you know of one, please say....

TIA
Bryden (4161)
771943 2009-05-07 09:48:00 Not that much cheaper from the prices I saw.... $800+ for a 26" television, not that much less for a 26" monitor, which after all is only useful as part of a computer.... however, maybe there is a downside that I am not aware of? If you know of one, please say....

TIA

Resolution-26" TVs are usually low in resolution while monitors that size are usually Full HD or close to Fulld HD
Blam (54)
771944 2009-05-07 09:49:00 For starters the resolution of a $800 TV is likely to be lower than a monitor.

Edit: You beat me to it blam :)
davidmmac (4619)
771945 2009-05-07 23:28:00 For example, a Sony KLV26T400A which is a 26" BRAVIA LCD TV only runs a resolution of about 1366x768. It RRPs for about $900. For similar money, you can get a proper LCD monitor that will do at least 1920x1200.

So, the disadvantage is the cost of a 26" TV with high resolution support is typically much more than a 26" monitor of the same resolution.
inphinity (7274)
1 2