| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 85088 | 2007-11-29 09:40:00 | Controversial poll.. | russell108 (7499) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 616507 | 2007-12-07 00:37:00 | :thumbs: Wink wink indeed. Say no more. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 616508 | 2007-12-07 02:44:00 | Interesting here, russell108 is trying to convince others to "keep an open mind" and watch the film, yet has himself watched the film and now subsequently fails to "keep an open mind". I take my hat off to Bruce, you just made my day mate! :D |
Chilling_Silence (9) | ||
| 616509 | 2007-12-07 03:09:00 | one of the many criticisms of the official govt. story is that unlike any other building fire/collapse, the scene was immediately removed and the wreckage/debris never examined where they had fallen - which is a breach of very common laws designed to help find the cause and mode of failure Maybe a search for survivors? Next time your in a car accident remind the rescue team not to cut you out until the accident investigation team has done there job, wouldn't want to destroy any evidence. |
plod (107) | ||
| 616510 | 2007-12-07 04:34:00 | You know, you and WinMacGuy should date. Now look what your suggestion got us - - > Windows Vista Basics Man |
R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 616511 | 2007-12-07 06:00:00 | Now look what your suggestion got us - - > Windows Vista Basics Man I purchased a teddy bear for a tenner today I called it Mohammed then sold it for twenty quid My question is . . . . Have I made a prophet? |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 616512 | 2007-12-07 08:43:00 | Interesting here, russell108 is trying to convince others to "keep an open mind" and watch the film, yet has himself watched the film and now subsequently fails to "keep an open mind". You do know that is a double edged sword you are wielding there....? |
andrew93 (249) | ||
| 616513 | 2007-12-07 08:47:00 | I purchased a teddy bear for a tenner today I called it Mohammed then sold it for twenty quid My question is.... Have I made a prophet? Groan. |
R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 616514 | 2007-12-07 08:57:00 | You do know that is a double edged sword you are wielding there....? I'd be surpized if he did...these people are only here to entertain each other anyway;) |
russell108 (7499) | ||
| 616515 | 2007-12-07 10:11:00 | how it the inner core of the tower, a very strongly built section of vertical steel beams, meant to crumple vertically like that - sure the floors could come loose, but we should still be left with the centre sticking "1000 feet" into the air . Ummm . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 ft vertical steel beams? I don't think so, they were jointed at regular intervals you see . This is what happens when you get carried away with conspiracy theories, you suspend your critical faculties and forget commonsense . Same sort of thing happens when guys get drunk and wake up next morning lying next to a slapper they'd gnaw their right arm off to escape rather than risk waking she/he/it . If they hadn't had their judgment short-circuited by booze and libido they wouldn't have looked at her, let alone touched her . Its a good thing 'Billy T' is here to keep us all straight . . . i mean god forbid we should listen to the architects/structural engineers who built the WTC or a Physics professor who says it could only have collapsed in that fashion thru the use of thermite . Funny you should mention that Russ, I got my information about the collapse from a very interesting TV program featuring none other than the design engineer responsible for the structural steelwork . He was also responsible for inspecting the installation and he had the photos of the inadequately applied insulation . He kinda trumps your physics professor . So many people park their brain on the shelf when conspiracy theories get started then go on to quote all sorts of "authoritative sources" who are in turn just giving their own personal opinions with nothing of substance to back them up . Anyway, I repeat, there's no way a "conspiracy" of that magnitude could be kept hidden, especially one that defies all logic and commonsense, because human nature doesn't permit, so maybe it's time to use Occam's razor on the whole argument . The most useful statement of the principle of Occam's razor is: "when you have two competing theories which produce exactly the same outcomes, the one that is simpler is the better . " Ergo, two planes flew into the towers, they burned and collapsed due to construction shortcomings . While you are about it, apply the razor to this statement: "If the Pentagon was not hit by a plane, where is that plane and its passengers now?" It's gotta be somewhere you see, otherwise it is still missing and it was last seen going in that direction . Cheers Billy 8-{) |
Billy T (70) | ||
| 616516 | 2007-12-10 06:42:00 | We were all wrong. It was the penguin. (www.imagef1.net.nz) |
wratterus (105) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 | |||||