| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 85427 | 2007-12-10 02:06:00 | Wireless speeds | curly (6655) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 619753 | 2007-12-10 02:06:00 | 802.11g can support speeds of 54 Mpbs right? But what wireless format can support 108 Mbps? I'm sure I have seen the 108 Mbps somewhere, but damned if I can find any reference to it now. |
curly (6655) | ||
| 619754 | 2007-12-10 02:11:00 | 802.11g can support speeds of 54 Mpbs right? But what wireless format can support 108 Mbps? I'm sure I have seen the 108 Mbps somewhere, but damned if I can find any reference to it now. N |
plod (107) | ||
| 619755 | 2007-12-10 02:13:00 | Actually N is faster than 54 and 108. But its more expensive. 108 would be in between. And doesnt have to be N to support 108. |
Speedy Gonzales (78) | ||
| 619756 | 2007-12-10 02:22:00 | Actually N is faster than 54 and 108. But its more expensive. 108 would be in between. And doesnt have to be N to support 108. So would 108 have been the G Plus, that was going around a couple of years ago? |
plod (107) | ||
| 619757 | 2007-12-10 02:31:00 | This I would say (en.wikipedia.org) Super G And this is Wireless-N (en.wikipedia.org) Which also supports a longer range than 11.b or 11.g. And 108 I would say. |
Speedy Gonzales (78) | ||
| 619758 | 2007-12-10 02:33:00 | See here for speed details: en.wikipedia.org Some Pre-N spec routers advertise a speed of 108, but YMMV... |
Chilling_Silence (9) | ||
| 619759 | 2007-12-10 02:34:00 | You'll see routers touting "Super G" or similar speeds. It isn't an "official" standard, and is proprietray to the vendor. Basically they all started making use of MIMO - multiple anntenas and clever tricks to get a stronger signal using the multiple paths the signals take between router and client - to boost standard G speed/signal strength. The very same technologies that are part of N. | Biggles (121) | ||
| 1 | |||||