| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 100370 | 2009-06-05 03:15:00 | Which VNC? | nofam (9009) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 779802 | 2009-06-05 03:15:00 | I'm currently using TightVNC from my laptop to my headless media server at home, and was just wondering: - What is the difference between all the VNC's (tight/ultra/real etc) - What is the most efficient/fastest? I don't need any encrypted file transfer capability etc - just the basics as fast as possible. :thumbs: |
nofam (9009) | ||
| 779803 | 2009-06-05 03:51:00 | I use ultra myself....cant say I have noticed speed differences between the versions as such, just stablilty | SolMiester (139) | ||
| 779804 | 2009-06-05 04:33:00 | I use Real VNC for LAN work, and Team Viewer over the internet. | wainuitech (129) | ||
| 779805 | 2009-06-05 05:08:00 | I have also used www.mesh.com (Microsoft Live Mesh).. Its little slow compare to TightVNC (which I used in my previous jobs) | babip (14282) | ||
| 779806 | 2009-06-05 05:33:00 | I use ultra, and ultra over hamachi for tricky situations. | Rob99 (151) | ||
| 779807 | 2009-06-05 06:00:00 | I don't see an differences really, all do the same thing anyways. | Blam (54) | ||
| 779808 | 2009-06-05 23:45:00 | I've used TightVNC for years now, after the version that I was using was spawning the java interface all the time... but VNC is a standard, so basically you're just picking an app based on "optional extras". I gotta admit, Ultra VNC looks pretty good, might give it a whirl :) |
Chilling_Silence (9) | ||
| 1 | |||||