| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 145355 | 2017-10-09 05:02:00 | Well what is the consensus of what the new Government will look like? | B.M. (505) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1440594 | 2017-10-28 06:39:00 | Uh, time to lock this thread? Nah, just take out the trash. There is something seriously wrong with him. I assume it's a him. |
allblack (6574) | ||
| 1440595 | 2017-10-28 06:48:00 | Uh, time to lock this thread? Nahhh, just a bit of Bifo, don’t read it if it offends. I enjoy sitting in the “Political Centre” and laughing at the extremists. Remember, the freedom of free speech doesn’t revolve around just a few. |
B.M. (505) | ||
| 1440596 | 2017-10-28 08:30:00 | I enjoy listening to the idiots' points of view. "We'll see what happens...." |
Zippity (58) | ||
| 1440597 | 2017-10-28 18:47:00 | I’s all right Zippity, anger is just part of the grieving process. You’ll get over it and the Politicians don’t run the country anyway. The Bureaucrats do and they haven’t changed. ;) Have you not noticed that in the absence of any Politicians how smoothly the country has run. :) |
B.M. (505) | ||
| 1440598 | 2017-10-28 19:55:00 | I enjoy listening to the idiots' points of view. "We'll see what happens...." Pays to be careful making comments like that :D Its happened many times a comment comes back to bite on the backside. With that in mind, lets bookmark this Thread, then in a year or two come back and see what's developed or changed for good or Bad :). |
wainuitech (129) | ||
| 1440599 | 2017-10-28 20:34:00 | With that in mind, lets bookmark this Thread, then in a year or two come back and see what's developed or changed for good or Bad :). Great idea. It is far to early to judge the current lot. They will either do well or they will be gone again next election. |
CliveM (6007) | ||
| 1440600 | 2017-10-29 05:49:00 | Your formula is correct, Nick . But I rejected the textbook approach as too simplistic, using instead the Reserve Bank calculator with a reverse approach . My septuagenarian (undoubtedly at least partially atrophied) brain reasoned that to be more realistic, as it (RBNZ) uses historical quarterly indices . By no means accurate, it does however factor in a degree of realism appropriate for this forum and discussion . I did use the building sector calculation whereas strictly speaking I should have used wages . . rbnz . govt . nz/monetary-policy/inflation-calculator" target="_blank">www . rbnz . govt . nz :) I'm not too sure how discounting cash flows at the rate of inflation is too simplistic . To me, it seems like a pretty accurate way of . . . . adjusting cash flows for inflation . I mean if we really wanted to get into the technical side of things, the CPI isn't a perfect measure of inflation, as it depends on how accurately the weights reflect current spending trends, and as a Laspeyres index, will slightly overstate inflation . |
Nick G (16709) | ||
| 1440601 | 2017-10-29 07:45:00 | I'm not too sure how discounting cash flows at the rate of inflation is too simplistic. To me, it seems like a pretty accurate way of....adjusting cash flows for inflation. I mean if we really wanted to get into the technical side of things, the CPI isn't a perfect measure of inflation, as it depends on how accurately the weights reflect current spending trends, and as a Laspeyres index, will slightly overstate inflation. Jesus I cant understand any of that lol. |
prefect (6291) | ||
| 1440602 | 2017-10-29 20:03:00 | Jesus I cant understand any of that lol. You're in good company, prefect. You and your lefty mates on the treasury benches :lol: |
WalOne (4202) | ||
| 1440603 | 2017-10-29 20:13:00 | At least they do maths, unlike lying Steve and shifty Bill :lol: | KarameaDave (15222) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 | |||||