| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 89793 | 2008-05-12 08:10:00 | Close up | SolMiester (139) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 668595 | 2008-05-13 01:00:00 | The police decision to prosecute possibly depended on how she initially described what she did. There was emphasis on checking mirrors on Close Up etc but it seems that she was moving left before pulling back into the overtaking lane. The drunk driver swerved for some reason maybe thinking he was being cut off and lost control. | PaulD (232) | ||
| 668596 | 2008-05-13 01:59:00 | The police decision to prosecute possibly depended on how she initially described what she did. The innocence of those who still think they are always the good guys........ |
pctek (84) | ||
| 668597 | 2008-05-13 04:02:00 | The police decision to prosecute possibly depended on how she initially described what she did. There was emphasis on checking mirrors on Close Up etc but it seems that she was moving left before pulling back into the overtaking lane. The drunk driver swerved for some reason maybe thinking he was being cut off and lost control. Rose tints? The police lay charges wherever they can in the hope they get a prosecution, anyway ,anywhere, anyhow. How utterly stupid their actions are is usually dependant on the mentality of the cop in question, and there are some shocking numbnuts out there dressed up in their nice blue uniform. Pity that the police (and politicians) are never accountable for their actions, the cop in question should be paying her legal fees, and taking a job pumping gas. You can't raise standards by giving every retarded stunt the big tick of aproval, It doesn't happen in most jobs. |
Metla (12) | ||
| 668598 | 2008-05-13 05:25:00 | There but for the grace of god go ................. Lets hope we are not put in her position. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||