Forum Home
PC World Chat
Thread ID: 90653	2008-06-11 09:31:00	LOLCAT NEWTONS LAW	freddy73 (13691)	PC World Chat

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
677569	2008-06-11 09:31:00	NEWTONS LAWS OV MOSHUN DESCRIBE TEH ACCELERASHUN OV MASIF PARTICLEZ. IN MODERN LANGUAGE, TEH LAWS CUD BE STATD AS: FURST LAW IT POSIBLE 2 SELECT SET OV REFERENCE FRAMEZ, CALLD INERTIAL REFERENCE FRAMEZ, OBSERVD FRUM WHICH PARTICLE MOVEZ WITHOUT ANY CHANGE IN VELOCITY IF NO NET FORCE ACTS ON IT. DIS LAW IZ OFTEN SIMPLIFID INTO TEH SENTENCE "AN OBJECT WILL STAY AT REST OR CONTINUE AT CONSTANT VELOCITY UNLES ACTD UPON BY AN EXTERNAL UNBALANCD FORCE". SECOND LAW OBSERVD FRUM AN INERTIAL REFERENCE FRAME, TEH NET FORCE ON PARTICLE IZ PROPORSHUNAL 2 TEH TIEM RATE OV CHANGE OV ITZ LINEAR MOMENTUM: F = D ( MV ) / DT. MOMENTUM MV IZ TEH PRODUCT OV MAS AN VELOCITY. DIS LAW IZ OFTEN STATD AS F = M (TEH NET FORCE ON AN OBJECT IZ EQUAL 2 TEH MAS OV TEH OBJECT MULTIPLID BY ITZ ACCELERASHUN), BUT DIS APPROXIMASHUN 2 TEH LAW IZ ACCURATE ONLY 4 SPEEDZ MUTCH LES THAN TEH SPED OV LIGHT. AN IMPORTANT POINT IZ DAT FORCE AN MOMENTUM R VECTOR QUANTITIEZ AN DAT TEH RESULTANT FORCE IZ FINDZ FRUM ALL TEH FORCEZ PRESENT BY VECTOR ADDISHUN. THIRD LAW WHENEVR PARTICLE EXERTS FORCE ON ANOTHR PARTICLE B, B SIMULTANEOUSLY EXERTS FORCE ON WIF TEH SAME MAGNITUDE IN DA OPPOSIET DIRECSHUN. TEH STRONG FORM OV TEH LAW FURTHR POSTULATEZ DAT THEES 2 FORCEZ ACT ALONG TEH SAME LINE. DIS LAW IZ OFTEN SIMPLIFID INTO TEH SENTENCE "EVRY ACSHUN HAS AN EQUAL AN OPPOSIET REACSHUN". IN DA GIVEN INTERPRETASHUN MAS, ACCELERASHUN, AN, MOST IMPORTANTLY, FORCE R ASSUMD 2 BE EXTERNALLY DEFIND QUANTITIEZ. DIS AR TEH TEH MOST COMMON, BUT NOT TEH ONLY INTERPRETASHUN: WAN CAN CONSIDR TEH LAWS 2 BE DEFINISHUN OV THEES QUANTITIEZ. NOTICE DAT TEH SECOND LAW ONLY HOLDZ WHEN TEH OBSERVASHUN IZ MADE FRUM AN INERTIAL REFERENCE FRAME, AN SINCE AN INERTIAL REFERENCE FRAME IZ DEFIND BY TEH FURST LAW, ASKIN PROOF OV TEH FURST LAW FRUM TEH SECOND LAW IZ LOGICAL FALLACY. :thanks for listening	freddy73 (13691)
677570	2008-06-11 09:37:00	Ah .... what was that?	Jen (38)
677571	2008-06-11 09:41:00	Can you start again, from where it says Newtons	Speedy Gonzales (78)
677572	2008-06-11 09:54:00	The reason the sun appears to spin around the earth is because of your big mass so much so that Fg is directed towards you. (i.e. Fg = kM1M2 / r^2) End of story :)	Renmoo (66)
677573	2008-06-11 09:58:00	... because of your big mass Who you calling fat?! :illogical	Jen (38)
677574	2008-06-11 10:07:00	Who you calling fat?! :illogical :D	Marnie (4574)
677575	2008-06-11 10:13:00	Its in lolcat.... Have a look in my sig I will change it to normal soon if ya want =)	password (5384)
677576	2008-06-11 10:24:00	TOO MUCH SHOUTING!	beeswax34 (63)
677577	2008-06-11 10:42:00	Who you calling fat?! :illogical Oh, no one. Just relating something to Physics :p	Renmoo (66)
677578	2008-06-11 10:52:00	This is most likely a waste of time but oh well lol here goes... Newtons laws of motion describes the acceleration of massive particals. in modern language, the laws could be stated as. First law. it is possible to select set of reference frames, called inertial? reference frames, observed from which particals moves without any change in velocity if no net force acts on it. This law is often simplified into the sentence "an object will stay at rest or continue at constant velocity unless acted upon by an external unbalanced force. Second law. Observed from an inertial? reference frame, the net force on particals is proportional to the time? rate of change of its linear momentum: F=D (MV)/ DT. Momentum MV is the product and mass and velocity. This law is often stated as F=M (the net force of an object Times by its acceleration), But this approximation to the law is accurate only for speeds much less then the speed of light. an important point is that force and momentum are vector quantities and that the resultant force is found? from all the forces present by vector addition. Third Law. Whenever partical exerts force on another partical B, B simultaneously exerts force with the same magnitude in the opposite direction. The strong form? of the law further .........? that these two forces act along the same line. This law is often simplified into the sentence "every action has an equal and opposite reaction". In the given interpretation mas, acceleration, and most importantly, force are assumed to be exorbitantly? defined quantities. This is the most common, But not the only interpretation: One can consider the laws to be definition of these quantities. Notice that the second law only holds then the observation is made from an inertial? reference frame, and since an inertial reference frame is defined by the first law, asking proof of the first law from the second law is logical falsity? Lol thats the best i could do lol..... Sorry if there is bad spelling... i was never any good. XD	password (5384)
1 2 3