| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 91492 | 2008-07-09 05:48:00 | Apple are morons | roddy_boy (4115) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 686704 | 2008-07-09 05:48:00 | blog.karppinen.fi | roddy_boy (4115) | ||
| 686705 | 2008-07-09 06:03:00 | I'd tend to agree. | Thebananamonkey (7741) | ||
| 686706 | 2008-07-09 06:09:00 | Not very clever. | vitalstatistix (9182) | ||
| 686707 | 2008-07-09 06:10:00 | I think the correct application of English Grammar requires that you say: "Apple AM morons" . referring to the singular condition of AN apple . You never see apples travel in a squish (a group of apples am called a "squish") . Had you used the plural subjunctive version of "apple" ie: "apples" then the correct grammatical application would be: "Apples IS morons", . . . . . whereby the definitive and the subjunctive should have the same numeric plurality . |
SurferJoe46 (51) | ||
| 686708 | 2008-07-09 06:18:00 | I think the correct application of English Grammar requires that you say: "Apple AM morons" . referring to the singular condition of AN apple . You never see apples travel in a squish (a group of apples am called a "squish") . Had you used the plural subjunctive version of "apple" ie: "apples" then the correct grammatical application would be: "Apples IS morons", . . . . . whereby the definitive and the subjunctive should have the same numeric plurality . :confused: er what's that in English? |
vitalstatistix (9182) | ||
| 686709 | 2008-07-09 06:22:00 | :confused: er what's that in English? No, that was american |
plod (107) | ||
| 686710 | 2008-07-09 07:45:00 | Wow! Thats super crazy, but how did this guy find out about this email that was sent Based on the emails that have appeared in my .Mac mailbox, this was accomplished by sending this classy one-liner to Apple: am forget my password of mac,did you give me password on new email marko.[redacted]@yahoo.com . For it to have appeared in his .Mac mailbox, it would mean that the initial email was sent from the .Mac mailbox, meaning his security was already compromised. He could have read it in a reply, but one would assume that if they sent that reply, they would have sent it to the same address "marko.[redacted]@yahoo.com" (which the blogger shouldn't have had access to since that isn't his account anyway) that they would have sent the new password to, rather than to his own email address. Couldn't help but feel that that didn't make sense. |
Deathwish (143) | ||
| 686711 | 2008-07-10 05:39:00 | Probably CCed it. | roddy_boy (4115) | ||
| 686712 | 2008-07-10 07:58:00 | Probably CCed it. CC? |
Deathwish (143) | ||
| 686713 | 2008-07-10 08:01:00 | Carbon copy. | roddy_boy (4115) | ||
| 1 | |||||